Environmental Engineering / Çevre Mühendisliği
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/4321
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 26Citation - Scopus: 34Arsenite Removal From Groundwater in a Batch Electrocoagulation Process: Optimization Through Response Surface Methodology(Taylor & Francis, 2019) Şık, Emrah; Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur; Demirbaş, Erhan; Kobya, Mehmet; Öncel, Mehmet SalimIn this study, influences of seven process variables such as initial pH (pH(i)), applied current (i), operating time (t(EC)), initial As(III) concentration (C-o), diameter of Fe ball anode (d(p)), column height in the electrocoagulation (EC) reactor (h) and airflow rate (Q(air)) for removal of As(III) from groundwater by a new air-fed fixed-bed EC reactor were evaluated with a response surface methodology (RSM). The proposed quadratic model fitted very well with the experimental data for the responses. The removal efficiencies and operating costs were determined to be 99% and 0.01 $/m(3) at the optimum operating conditions (a pH(i) of 8.5, 0.05 A, 4.94 min, d(p) of 9.24 mm, h of 7.49 cm, Q(air) of 9.98 L/min for 50 mu g/L). This study clearly showed that the RSM in the EC process was a very suitable method to optimize the operating conditions at the target value of effluent As(III) concentration (10 mu g/L) while keeping the operating cost to minimal and maximize the removal efficiency.Article Citation - WoS: 4Citation - Scopus: 5Combined Influence of Some Cations on Arsenic Removal by an Air-Injection Ec Reactor Using Aluminum Ball Electrodes(Desalination Publications, 2020) Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur; Kobya, Mehmet; Şık, Emrah; Demirbaş, Erhan; Öncel, Mehmet SalimCombined effects of some cations such as calcium (Ca2+), iron (Fe2+), manganese (Mn2+), and magnesium (Mg2+) and operating time on the removal of arsenic by air-injected electrocoagulation (EC) reactor with aluminum (Al) ball electrodes were investigated. The operating conditions were optimized with the Box-Behnken design of response surface methodology (RSM). The response variables were selected from the program as removal efficiency, residual arsenic concentration, energy consumption and operating cost (OC) in the EC process. A total of 46 experimental run was performed. The removal efficiency of arsenic increased with an increase in iron concentration (0.5-4.5 mg/L). The rest of the cations showed no noticeable effect on arsenic removal efficiency. The maximum arsenic removal efficiency and minimum OC at the optimum operating conditions (C-Ca: 305 mg/L, C-Mg: 42 mg/L, C-Fe: 3.3 mg/L, C-Mn: 2.34 mg/L, initial pH of 7.5 applied current of 0.15 A, Al ball size of 7.5 mm, 5.0 cm of Al ball anodes height in the EC reactor, air-fed rate of 6.0 L/min and t(EC): 16.83 min) in the EC process were 99.9% and 0.0332 $/m(3) for initial arsenic concentration of 200 mu g/L, respectively. The removal mechanism of As(III) by EC seems to be oxidation of As(III) to As(V) and subsequent removal by adsorption/complexation with aluminum hydroxides generated in the process. The results showed that the air-injected EC reactor can be used effectively for arsenic and hardness removal simultaneously from real groundwater sources.