Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Article Automating Software Size Measurement from Python Code Using Language Models(Springer, 2025) Tenekeci, Samet; Unlu, Huseyin; Gul, Bedir Arda; Keles, Damla; Kuuk, Murat; Demirors, OnurSoftware size is a key input for project planning, effort estimation, and productivity analysis. While pre-trained language models have shown promise in deriving functional size from natural-language requirements, measuring size directly from source code remains under-explored. Yet, code-based size measurement is critical in modern workflows where requirement documents are often incomplete or unavailable, especially in Agile development environments. This exploratory study investigates the use of CodeBERT, a pre-trained bimodal transformer model, for measuring software size directly from Python source code according to two measurement methods: COSMIC Function Points and MicroM. We construct two curated datasets from the Python subset of the CodeSearchNet corpus, and manually annotate each function with its corresponding size. Our experimental results show that CodeBERT can successfully measure COSMIC data movements with up to 91.4% accuracy and generalize to the functional, architectural, and algorithmic event types defined in MicroM, reaching up to 81.5% accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of code-based language models for automated functional size measurement when requirement artifacts are absent or unreliable.Article An Alternative Software Benchmarking Dataset: Effort Estimation With Machine Learning(Elsevier Science Inc, 2026) Yurum, Ozan Rasit; Unlu, Huseyin; Demirors, OnurEffort estimation plays a vital role in software project planning, as accurate estimates of required human resources are essential for success. Traditional estimation models often depend on historical size and effort data, yet organizations frequently struggle to access reliable effort records. Public benchmarking datasets like ISBSG offer useful data but may lack coverage or involve licensing fees. To address this issue, we previously introduced a free, extendable benchmarking dataset that integrates functional size and effort data extracted from 18 studies. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of our dataset for predictive effort estimation and compare it with the widely used ISBSG dataset. Our analysis includes 337 records from our dataset and 732 ISBSG projects, focusing on those with COSMIC size data. We first developed and compared models using linear regression and nine machine learning algorithms - Bayesian Ridge, Ridge Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, k-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Support Vector Regression. Then, we selected the best-performing models and applied them to an unseen evaluation dataset to assess their generalization performance. The results show that machine learning performance varies based on evaluation method and dataset characteristics. Despite having fewer records, our dataset enabled more accurate predictions than ISBSG in most cases, highlighting its potential for effort estimation. This study demonstrates the viability of our dataset for building predictive models and supports the use of machine learning in improving estimation accuracy. Expanding this dataset could offer a valuable, open-access resource for organizations seeking effective and lowcost estimation solutions.Conference Object Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Towards the Construction of a Software Benchmarking Dataset Via Systematic Literature Review(IEEE, 2024) Yurum, Ozan Rasit; Unlu, Huseyin; Demirors, OnurEffort estimation is a fundamental task during the planning of software projects. Prediction models usually rely on two essential factors: software size and effort data. Measuring the size of the software can be done at various stages of the project with desired accuracy. Nevertheless, the industry faces challenges when it comes to collecting reliable actual effort data. Consequently, organizations encounter difficulties in establishing effort prediction models. Benchmarking datasets are available, but, in most cases, they have huge variances that make them less useful for effort prediction. In this study, we aimed to answer whether creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive dataset that gathers the functional size and effort data of the studies from the literature is unavailable. For this purpose, we performed a systematic literature review to find studies that include projects measured with the COSMIC Functional Size Measurement (FSM) method and the related effort. As a result, we formed a dataset including 337 records from 18 studies that shared the corresponding size and effort data. Although we performed a limited search, we created a larger dataset than many datasets in the literature. In light of our review, we obtained that most studies did not share their dataset, and many lacked case details such as implementation environment and the scope of software development life cycle activities included in the effort data. We also compared the dataset with the ISBSG repository and found that our dataset has less variation in productivity. Our review showed the applicability of creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. In conclusion, this study addresses gaps in the literature through a cost-free and easily extendable dataset.