Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 103Citation - Scopus: 110Cold Sintering of Ceramics and Glasses: a Review(Elsevier Ltd., 2020) Ahmetoğlu, Çekdar Vakıf; Ahmetoğlu, Çekdar Vakıf; Karacasulu, Levent; 03.09. Department of Materials Science and Engineering; 01.01. Units Affiliated to the Rectorate; 01. Izmir Institute of Technology; 03. Faculty of EngineeringTraditionally ceramic artifacts are processed at high temperatures (> 1000 degrees C) by classical sintering techniques such as solid state, liquid phase and pressure-assisted sintering. Recently, inspired from the geology, novel sintering approaches that allow the densification of ceramic components at relatively low temperatures <= 400 degrees C have been proposed. While initial efforts for such low temperature densification concept were developed in the mid-70s, the topic has become increasingly prominent in the last decade. Currently, these low temperature methods can be classified into four main groups: (i) hydrothermal reaction sintering (HRS), (ii) hydrothermal hot pressing (HHP), (iii) pressure-assisted densification techniques: room-temperature densification (RTD), cold sintering (CS), warm press (WP), and finally no-pressure assisted method called (iv) reactive hydrothermal liquid phase densification (rHLPD). Above named techniques are commonly assisted by an aqueous solution used as either reactant or transient liquid phase to assist densification. Starting from the background in traditional sintering processes, this review aims to explore in depth the existing literature about low temperature densification approaches along with their advantages & disadvantages, and probable application areas.Correction Citation - Scopus: 1Corrigendum To “hierarchically Porous Polymer Derived Ceramics: a Promising Platform for Multidrug Delivery Systems”[mater. Des. 140(supplement C) (2018) 37–44](Elsevier Ltd., 2018) Ahmetoğlu, Çekdar Vakıf; Ahmetoğlu, Çekdar Vakıf; Özalp, Veli Cengiz; Borsa, Barı Ata; Soraru, Gian Domenico; 03.09. Department of Materials Science and Engineering; 03. Faculty of Engineering; 01. Izmir Institute of TechnologyThe authors regret to inform that The TMTVS ratios for samples were written incorrectly. The true weight ratios for PHMS/LDH/PDMS/TMTVS blends should be as follows: Bio1 = 1/0.055/0.25/0.055, and Bio2 = 1/0.055/1/0.055. The discussion in the study is not affected by this mistype and actually the previous paper [1] cited also in the paper as ref.#44 gives right values for the sample preparation. The authors would like to apologize for the inconvenience caused.
