Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Comparison of Magnetic Seed and Rfid Methods in the Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions(Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024) Sanli, Ahmet Necati; Sanli, Deniz E. Tekcan; Golshan, Mehra; Sezgin, Efe; Celik, Varol; Aydogan, FatihBackground: Many methods have been developed for localizing non-palpable breast lesions. This study investigated the success rate and surgical results of the magnetic seed (Magseed) and radiofrequency identification (RFID) method, which are relatively new compared to standard wire-guided localizations. Materials and Methods: 20 simulation (10 Magseed, 10 RFID) models were created using turkey breasts and raisins. Raisins containing magnetic seed and RFID tags were placed on the turkey breast. Sentimag (R) probe was used for the Magseed group, and Faxitron LOCalizer (TM) System device was used in the RFID group. Both methods were evaluated in terms of accuracy in detecting breast lesion localization, operation times, excised tissue weights, total resection volume, surgical margin negativity, and re-excision rates. Results: Lesion localization success in both techniques was 100%. While procedure times were statistically significantly shorter in the Magseed group, incision lengths were shorter in the RFID group (P = 0.013, P = 0.007, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for the weight of the removed parts, total resection volume, and surgical margin distance (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In this feasibility study, it was concluded that neither the RFID nor Magseed methods had a significant advantage over each other, in terms of localization detection and surgical margin negativity, and both methods could be used successfully for localization.Article Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 4Comparison of Radio-Guided Occult Lesion Localization (roll) and Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization (moll) for Non-Palpable Lesions: a Phantom Model Study(Elsevier, 2020) Aydoğan, Tumay; Sezgin, Efe; İlvan, Şennur; Yılmaz, Osman Cem; Aslan, Nesrin; Golshan, Mehra; Aydoğan, FatihWe sought to compare radio-guided localization and magnetic tracer localization techniques by using a phantom model for excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. There was no difference between the groups in the duration of operative excision, specimen weight, or specimen volume. Magnetic occult lesion localization can be performed in clinics without the need for a nuclear medicine team and radiation safety procedures. Background: Localization of nonpalpable breast cancers can be achieved with several techniques. We sought to compare radio-guided localization (ROLL) and magnetic tracer localization (MOLL) techniques by using a phantom model we previously developed, which can provide an accurate simulation for excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. Materials and Methods: We designed 20 phantom models (10 MOLL, 10 ROLL group) for localization. A handheld gamma probe for the ROLL group and a manual magnetometer (SentiMag) for the MOLL group were used to test the ability of the modality to detect olives in turkey breasts. The excision time for each procedure, specimen size, and weight of the specimens removed from the turkey breasts were recorded. Results: Both techniques resulted in 100% retrieval of the lesions. There was no difference between the groups in the duration of operative excision, specimen weight, or specimen volume. Conclusion: This experimental trial found similar success rates for ROLL and MOLL in localization of occult lesions using the turkey breast phantom model. MOLL can be performed in clinics without the need for a nuclear medicine team and radiation safety procedures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.