Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Conference Object Citation - WoS: 146Citation - Scopus: 216The Visual Object Tracking Vot2013 Challenge Results(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013) Kristan, Matej; Pflugfelder, Roman; Leonardis, Ales; Matas, Jiri; Porikli, Fatih; Cehovin, Luka; Nebehay, Georg; Fernandez, Gustavo; Vojir, Tomas; Gatt, Adam; Khajenezhad, Ahmad; Salahledin, Ahmed; Soltani-Farani, Ali; Zarezade, Ali; Petrosino, Alfredo; Milton, Anthony; Bozorgtabar, Behzad; Li, Bo; Chan, Chee Seng; Heng, Cher Keng; Ward, Dale; Kearney, David; Monekosso, Dorothy; Karaimer, Hakkı Can; Rabiee, Hamid R.; Zhu, Jianke; Gao, Jin; Xiao, Jingjing; Zhang, Junge; Xing, Junliang; Huang, Kaiqi; Lebeda, Karel; Cao, Lijun; Maresca, Mario Edoardo; Lim, Mei Kuan; El Helw, Mohamed; Felsberg, Michael; Remagnino, Paolo; Bowden, Richard; Goecke, Roland; Stolkin, Rustam; Lim, Samantha YueYing; Maher, Sara; Poullot, Sebastien; Wong, Sebastien; Satoh, Shin’ichi; Chen, Weihua; Hu, Weiming; Zhang, Xiaoqin; Li, Yang; Zhi Heng, Niu; 01. Izmir Institute of TechnologyVisual tracking has attracted a significant attention in the last few decades. The recent surge in the number of publications on tracking-related problems have made it almost impossible to follow the developments in the field. One of the reasons is that there is a lack of commonly accepted annotated data-sets and standardized evaluation protocols that would allow objective comparison of different tracking methods. To address this issue, the Visual Object Tracking (VOT) workshop was organized in conjunction with ICCV2013. Researchers from academia as well as industry were invited to participate in the first VOT2013 challenge which aimed at single-object visual trackers that do not apply pre-learned models of object appearance (model-free). Presented here is the VOT2013 benchmark dataset for evaluation of single-object visual trackers as well as the results obtained by the trackers competing in the challenge. In contrast to related attempts in tracker benchmarking, the dataset is labeled per-frame by visual attributes that indicate occlusion, illumination change, motion change, size change and camera motion, offering a more systematic comparison of the trackers. Furthermore, we have designed an automated system for performing and evaluating the experiments. We present the evaluation protocol of the VOT2013 challenge and the results of a comparison of 27 trackers on the benchmark dataset. The dataset, the evaluation tools and the tracker rankings are publicly available from the challenge website (http://votchallenge. net).Conference Object Citation - WoS: 16Citation - Scopus: 18Combining Shape-Based and Gradient-Based Classifiers for Vehicle Classification(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015) Karaimer, Hakkı Can; Çınaroğlu, İbrahim; Baştanlar, Yalın; 03.04. Department of Computer Engineering; 03. Faculty of Engineering; 01. Izmir Institute of TechnologyIn this paper, we present our work on vehicle classification with omnidirectional cameras. In particular, we investigate whether the combined use of shape-based and gradient-based classifiers outperforms the individual classifiers or not. For shape-based classification, we extract features from the silhouettes in the omnidirectional video frames, which are obtained after background subtraction. Classification is performed with kNN (k Nearest Neighbors) method, which has been commonly used in shape-based vehicle classification studies in the past. For gradient-based classification, we employ HOG (Histogram of Oriented Gradients) features. Instead of searching a whole video frame, we extract the features in the region located by the foreground silhouette. We use SVM (Support Vector Machines) as the classifier since HOG+SVM is a commonly used pair in visual object detection. The vehicle types that we worked on are motorcycle, car and van (minibus). In experiments, we first analyze the performances of shape-based and HOG-based classifiers separately. Then, we analyze the performance of the combined classifier where the two classifiers are fused at decision level. Results show that the combined classifier is superior to the individual classifiers. © 2015 IEEE.
