Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Article Automating Software Size Measurement from Python Code Using Language Models(Springer, 2025) Tenekeci, Samet; Unlu, Huseyin; Gul, Bedir Arda; Keles, Damla; Kuuk, Murat; Demirors, OnurSoftware size is a key input for project planning, effort estimation, and productivity analysis. While pre-trained language models have shown promise in deriving functional size from natural-language requirements, measuring size directly from source code remains under-explored. Yet, code-based size measurement is critical in modern workflows where requirement documents are often incomplete or unavailable, especially in Agile development environments. This exploratory study investigates the use of CodeBERT, a pre-trained bimodal transformer model, for measuring software size directly from Python source code according to two measurement methods: COSMIC Function Points and MicroM. We construct two curated datasets from the Python subset of the CodeSearchNet corpus, and manually annotate each function with its corresponding size. Our experimental results show that CodeBERT can successfully measure COSMIC data movements with up to 91.4% accuracy and generalize to the functional, architectural, and algorithmic event types defined in MicroM, reaching up to 81.5% accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of code-based language models for automated functional size measurement when requirement artifacts are absent or unreliable.Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Automating Software Size Measurement With Language Models: Insights From Industrial Case Studies(Elsevier Science Inc, 2026) Unlu, Huseyin; Tenekeci, Samet; Kennouche, Dhia Eddine; Demirors, OnurObjective software size measurement is critical for accurate effort estimation, yet many organizations avoid it due to high costs, required expertise, and time-consuming manual effort. This often leads to vague predictions, poor planning, and project overruns. To address this challenge, we investigate the use of pre-trained language models - BERT and SE-BERT - to automate size measurement based on textual requirements using COSMIC and MicroM methods. We constructed one heterogeneous dataset and two industrial datasets, each manually measured by experienced analysts. Models were evaluated in three settings: (i) generic model evaluation, where the models are trained and tested on heterogeneous data, (ii) internal evaluation, where the models are trained and tested on organization-specific data, and (iii) external evaluation, where generic models were tested on organization-specific data. Results show that organization-specific models significantly outperform generic models, indicating that aligning training data with the target organization's requirement style is critical for accuracy. SE-BERT, a domain-adapted variant of BERT, improves performance, particularly in low-resource settings. These findings highlight the practical potential of tailoring training data for broader adoption and cost-effective software size measurement in industrial contexts.Conference Object Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 5Predicting Software Functional Size Using Natural Language Processing: an Exploratory Case Study(IEEE, 2024) Unlu, Huseyin; Tenekeci, Samet; Ciftci, Can; Oral, Ibrahim Baran; Atalay, Tunahan; Hacaloglu, Tuna; Demirors, OnurSoftware Size Measurement (SSM) plays an essential role in software project management as it enables the acquisition of software size, which is the primary input for development effort and schedule estimation. However, many small and medium-sized companies cannot perform objective SSM and Software Effort Estimation (SEE) due to the lack of resources and an expert workforce. This results in inadequate estimates and projects exceeding the planned time and budget. Therefore, organizations need to perform objective SSM and SEE using minimal resources without an expert workforce. In this research, we conducted an exploratory case study to predict the functional size of software project requirements using state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). For this aim, we fine-tuned BERT and BERT_SE with a set of user stories and their respective functional size in COSMIC Function Points (CFP). We gathered the user stories included in different project requirement documents. In total size prediction, we achieved 72.8% accuracy with BERT and 74.4% accuracy with BERT_SE. In data movement-based size prediction, we achieved 87.5% average accuracy with BERT and 88.1% average accuracy with BERT_SE. Although we use relatively small datasets in model training, these results are promising and hold significant value as they demonstrate the practical utility of language models in SSM.Conference Object Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Towards the Construction of a Software Benchmarking Dataset Via Systematic Literature Review(IEEE, 2024) Yurum, Ozan Rasit; Unlu, Huseyin; Demirors, OnurEffort estimation is a fundamental task during the planning of software projects. Prediction models usually rely on two essential factors: software size and effort data. Measuring the size of the software can be done at various stages of the project with desired accuracy. Nevertheless, the industry faces challenges when it comes to collecting reliable actual effort data. Consequently, organizations encounter difficulties in establishing effort prediction models. Benchmarking datasets are available, but, in most cases, they have huge variances that make them less useful for effort prediction. In this study, we aimed to answer whether creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive dataset that gathers the functional size and effort data of the studies from the literature is unavailable. For this purpose, we performed a systematic literature review to find studies that include projects measured with the COSMIC Functional Size Measurement (FSM) method and the related effort. As a result, we formed a dataset including 337 records from 18 studies that shared the corresponding size and effort data. Although we performed a limited search, we created a larger dataset than many datasets in the literature. In light of our review, we obtained that most studies did not share their dataset, and many lacked case details such as implementation environment and the scope of software development life cycle activities included in the effort data. We also compared the dataset with the ISBSG repository and found that our dataset has less variation in productivity. Our review showed the applicability of creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. In conclusion, this study addresses gaps in the literature through a cost-free and easily extendable dataset.