Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7148

Browse

Filters

2024 - 20264

Settings

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Effort Estimation

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Conference Object
    Measuring the Size of Change Requests in Microservice-Based Software Projects
    (Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2026) Yenel, M.; Ünlu, H.; Demirors, O.
    Accurately estimating the effort required for implementing change requests remains a critical challenge in software engineering, especially in microservice-based software architectures (MSSA). Traditional functional size measurement methods often fail to capture the distinct characteristics of MSSAs. To address this limitation, we propose a change size measurement method based on MicroM, a size measurement approach specifically developed for MSSAs. The proposed method counts added, deleted, and modified events across functional, architectural, and algorithmic levels, and includes the number of affected initial requirements. We conducted an exploratory case study with 18 change requests and built four regression-based effort estimation models. The results show that combining event counts with the number of affected requirements improves estimation accuracy. Our method provides a more precise and context-aware way to estimate change-related effort in MSSA projects. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
  • Article
    An Alternative Software Benchmarking Dataset: Effort Estimation With Machine Learning
    (Elsevier Science Inc, 2026) Yurum, Ozan Rasit; Unlu, Huseyin; Demirors, Onur
    Effort estimation plays a vital role in software project planning, as accurate estimates of required human resources are essential for success. Traditional estimation models often depend on historical size and effort data, yet organizations frequently struggle to access reliable effort records. Public benchmarking datasets like ISBSG offer useful data but may lack coverage or involve licensing fees. To address this issue, we previously introduced a free, extendable benchmarking dataset that integrates functional size and effort data extracted from 18 studies. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of our dataset for predictive effort estimation and compare it with the widely used ISBSG dataset. Our analysis includes 337 records from our dataset and 732 ISBSG projects, focusing on those with COSMIC size data. We first developed and compared models using linear regression and nine machine learning algorithms - Bayesian Ridge, Ridge Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, k-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Support Vector Regression. Then, we selected the best-performing models and applied them to an unseen evaluation dataset to assess their generalization performance. The results show that machine learning performance varies based on evaluation method and dataset characteristics. Despite having fewer records, our dataset enabled more accurate predictions than ISBSG in most cases, highlighting its potential for effort estimation. This study demonstrates the viability of our dataset for building predictive models and supports the use of machine learning in improving estimation accuracy. Expanding this dataset could offer a valuable, open-access resource for organizations seeking effective and lowcost estimation solutions.
  • Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Towards the Construction of a Software Benchmarking Dataset Via Systematic Literature Review
    (IEEE, 2024) Yurum, Ozan Rasit; Unlu, Huseyin; Demirors, Onur
    Effort estimation is a fundamental task during the planning of software projects. Prediction models usually rely on two essential factors: software size and effort data. Measuring the size of the software can be done at various stages of the project with desired accuracy. Nevertheless, the industry faces challenges when it comes to collecting reliable actual effort data. Consequently, organizations encounter difficulties in establishing effort prediction models. Benchmarking datasets are available, but, in most cases, they have huge variances that make them less useful for effort prediction. In this study, we aimed to answer whether creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive dataset that gathers the functional size and effort data of the studies from the literature is unavailable. For this purpose, we performed a systematic literature review to find studies that include projects measured with the COSMIC Functional Size Measurement (FSM) method and the related effort. As a result, we formed a dataset including 337 records from 18 studies that shared the corresponding size and effort data. Although we performed a limited search, we created a larger dataset than many datasets in the literature. In light of our review, we obtained that most studies did not share their dataset, and many lacked case details such as implementation environment and the scope of software development life cycle activities included in the effort data. We also compared the dataset with the ISBSG repository and found that our dataset has less variation in productivity. Our review showed the applicability of creating a software benchmarking dataset is possible by gathering the data from the literature. In conclusion, this study addresses gaps in the literature through a cost-free and easily extendable dataset.
  • Conference Object
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Predicting Software Size and Effort From Code Using Natural Language Processing
    (CEUR-WS, 2024) Tenekeci, S.; Demirörs, Onur; Ünlü, H.; Dikenelli, E.; Selçuk, U.; Kılınç Soylu, G.; Demirörs, O.
    Software Size Measurement (SSM) holds a crucial role in software project management by facilitating the acquisition of software size, which serves as the primary input for development effort and schedule estimation. However, many small and medium-sized companies encounter challenges in conducting objective SSM and Software Effort Estimation (SEE) due to resource constraints and a lack of expert workforce. This often leads to inaccurate estimates and projects exceeding planned time and budget. Hence, organizations need to perform objective SSM and SEE with minimal resources and without relying on an expert workforce. In this research, we introduce two exploratory case studies aimed at predicting the functional size (COSMIC and Event-based size) and effort of software projects from the code using a deep-learning-based NLP model: CodeBERT. For this purpose, we collected and annotated two datasets consisting of 4800 Python and 1100 C# functions. Then, we trained a classification model to predict COSMIC data movements (entry, exit, read, write) and four regression models to predict Event-based size (interaction, communication, process) and effort. Despite utilizing a relatively small dataset for model training, we achieved promising results with an 84.5% accuracy for the COSMIC size, 0.13 normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) for the Event-based size, and 0.18 NMAE for the effort. These findings are particularly insightful as they demonstrate the practical utility of language models in SSM and SEE. © 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors.