GCRIS

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

On the Structure of Modules Defined by Opposites of Fp Injectivity
(Springer Verlag, 2019) Büyükaşık, Engin; Kafkas Demirci, Gizem
Let R be a ring with unity and let MR and RN be right and left modules,respectively. The module MR is said to be absolutely RN-pure if M circle times NL circle times N is amonomorphism for every extension LR of MR. For a module MR, the subpurity domain of MR is defined to be the collection of all modules RN, such that MR is absolutely RN-pure. Clearly, MR is absolutely RF-pure for every flat module RF and that MR is FP-injective if the subpurity domain of M is the entire class of left modules. As an opposite of FP-injective modules, MR is said to be a test for flatness by subpurity (or t.f.b.s. for short) if its subpurity domain is as small as possible, namely, consisting of exactly the flat left modules. We characterize the structure of t.f.b.s. modules over commutative hereditary Noetherian rings. We prove that a module M is t.f.b.s. over a commutative hereditary Noetherian ring if and only if M/Z(M) is t.f.b.s. if and only if Hom(M/Z(M),S)0 for each singular simple module S. Prufer domains are characterized as those domains all of whose nonzero finitely generated ideals are t.f.b.s.
Rings and Modules Characterized by Opposites of Fp-Injectivity
(Korean Mathematical Society, 2019) Büyükaşık, Engin; Kafkas Demirci, Gizem
Let R be a ring with unity. Given modules M-R and N-R, M-R is said to be absolutely N-R-pure if M circle times N -> L circle times N is a monomorphism for every extension L-R of M-R. For a module M-R, the subpurity domain of M-R is defined to be the collection of all modules N-R such that M-R is absolutely N-R-pure. Clearly M-R is absolutely F-R-pure for every flat module F-R, and that M-R is FP-injective if the subpurity domain of M is the entire class of left modules. As an opposite of FP-injective modules, M-R is said to be a test for flatness by subpurity (or t.f.b.s. for short) if its subpurity domain is as small as possible, namely, consisting of exactly the flat left modules. Every ring has a right t.f.b.s. module. R-R is t.f.b.s. and every finitely generated right ideal is finitely presented if and only if R is right semihereditary. A domain R is Priifer if and only if R is t.f.b.s. The rings whose simple right modules are t.f.b.s. or injective are completely characterized. Some necessary conditions for the rings whose right modules are t.f.b.s. or injective are obtained.
Citation - WoS: 12
Citation - Scopus: 11
Rugged Modules: the Opposite of Flatness
(Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2018) Büyükaşık, Engin; Enochs, Edgar; Rozas, J. R. García; Kafkas Demirci, Gizem; López-Permouth, Sergio; Oyonarte, Luis
Relative notions of flatness are introduced as a mean to gauge the extent of the flatness of any given module. Every module is thus endowed with a flatness domain and, for every ring, the collection of flatness domains of all of its modules is a lattice with respect to class inclusion. This lattice, the flatness profile of the ring, allows us, in particular, to focus on modules which have a smallest flatness domain (namely, one consisting of all regular modules.) We establish that such modules exist over arbitrary rings and we call them Rugged Modules. Rings all of whose (cyclic) modules are rugged are shown to be precisely the von Neumann regular rings. We consider rings without a flatness middle class (i.e., rings for which modules must be either flat or rugged.) We obtain that, over a right Noetherian ring every left module is rugged or flat if and only if every right module is poor or injective if and only if R = S×T, where S is semisimple Artinian and T is either Morita equivalent to a right PCI-domain, or T is right Artinian whose Jacobson radical properly contains no nonzero ideals. Character modules serve to bridge results about flatness and injectivity profiles; in particular, connections between rugged and poor modules are explored. If R is a ring whose regular left modules are semisimple, then a right module M is rugged if and only if its character left module M+ is poor. Rugged Abelian groups are fully characterized and shown to coincide precisely with injectively poor and projectively poor Abelian groups. Also, in order to get a feel for the class of rugged modules over an arbitrary ring, we consider the homological ubiquity of rugged modules in the category of all modules in terms of the feasibility of rugged precovers and covers for arbitrary modules.

Mathematics / Matematik

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results