WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7150

Browse

Filters

2018 - 201942020 - 20259

Settings

Access Right: Open AccessAuthor: search.filters.author.Soran, Atilla

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 13
  • Article
    Locoregional Treatment in De Novo Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Real-World Data, BOMETIN, Protocol MF14-1a
    (MDPI, 2025) Soran, Atilla; Demirors, Berkay; Aytac, Ozgur; Ozbas, Serdar; Dogan, Lutfi; Lucci, Anthony
    Introduction: The impact of locoregional treatment (LRT) on survival in de novo bone-only metastatic breast cancer (dnBOMBC) is controversial. This study aims to assess the effect of LRT on survival, utilizing international, prospectively acquired data in this cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with dnBOMBC were divided into two groups: those receiving systemic therapy only (ST) and those undergoing LRT. Further, patients who received LRT were divided into two subgroups: those who received ST after LRT (LRT+ST group) and those who received ST prior to LRT (ST+LRT group). Factors associated with disease progression, including solitary or multiple bone metastases, were analyzed. Results: There was a total of 744 patients with dnBOMBC treated at each of the participating institutions between 2014 and 2022, with 372 (50%) participants in each arm. Median follow-up was 48 months (32-66, 25-75%). Patients in the LRT group were significantly younger than the ST group [50 (42, 60) vs. 55 (44, 66), p = 0.0001]. There were no significant differences in grade, HER2 status, triple-negative status, receipt of hormonal therapy, or intervention to metastatic sites. During follow-up, 58% (n = 217) of patients in the ST group and 32% (n = 120) of patients in the LRT group died (p < 0.001). Local progression was observed in 20% of the patients in the ST group, whereas 9% progressed in the LRT group (p = 0.0001). Systemic progression occurred more in the ST group; 66% (n = 244) compared to 41% (n = 152) of patients in the LRT group (p < 0.001). The hazard of death was 64% lower in the LRT group than in the ST group (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.29-0.45, p < 0.0001). The burden of metastatic disease differed significantly between the two groups, with a higher rate of solitary bone metastases in the LRT group compared to the ST group (50% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). However, the LRT group had better overall survival (OS) for both solitary (HR: 0.38, 95% Cl: 0.26-0.55) and multiple (HR: 0.38, 95% Cl: 0.29-0.51) bone metastasis patients. Within the LRT group, survival rates were similar whether the breast surgery was performed before or after ST. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that LRT and ER/PR positivity significantly decrease the hazard of death (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Analysis of this large multi-institutional patient cohort provides further evidence that LRT is associated with longer OS and lower locoregional recurrence rates in patients with dnBOMBC. In breast cancer patients with bone-only metastases at presentation, the decision for LRT should be made through a multidisciplinary approach with consideration of surgical therapy at the primary tumor.
  • Erratum
    Correction: Intervention for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study–imet, Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2023) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Şenol, Kazım; Sezgin, Efe
    The authors‘ given names are correct as reflected here. © Society of Surgical Oncology 2022.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Aso Visual Abstract: Intervention for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients-Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study: Imet; Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2022) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, L.; Şenol, Kazım; Dağ, Ahmet; Karanlık, Hasan; Aytaç, Özgür; Karadeniz Çakmak, Güldeniz; Dalcı, Kubilay; Doğan, Mutlu; Sezer, Atakan Y.; Gökgöz, Şehsuvar; Özyar, Enis; Sezgin, Efe
    The aim of our prospective, multicenter registry study was to investigate the importance of interventions for operable lung and/or liver metastasis for breast cancer (BC) survival (https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12239-z). The results reveal that surgical resection or ablative interventions may contribute to survival in patients with BC with limited number and operable metachronous hepatic/pulmonary metastases. Ultimately, randomized studies will determine whether intervention on lung and liver metastatic sites should be performed. In the meantime, such interventions can be considered on select patients.
  • Conference Object
    Intervention To Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study-Imet; Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2022) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Şenol, Kazım; Dağ, Ahmet; Karanlık, Hasan; Aytaç, Özgür; Karadeniz Çakmak, Güldeniz; Dalcı, Kubilay; Doğan, Mutlu; Sezer, Atakan Y.; Gökgöz, Şehsuvar; Özyar, Enis; Sezgin, Efe
    Background/Objective: One‐fourth of early‐stage breast cancer (BC) becomes metastatic at follow‐up. Limited metastases represents a clinical state of metastatic disease that is limited in the number of metastatic sites and extent of disease, and amenable to metastasis‐directed intervention. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate intervention to limited metastases in lung and/or liver.
  • Conference Object
    Survival Impact of Intervention To Distant Metastatic Lesions in Patients With Breast Cancer
    (Springer, 2022) Abidi, Hira; Ayoade, Oluwaseun; McAuliffe, Priscilla; Johnson, Ronald; Lee, Joanna; Keenan, Donald; Steiman, Jennifer; Sezgin, Efe; Soran, Atilla
    INTRODUCTION: Approximately 25% of patients (pts) with stage I - III breast cancer (BC) develop distant metastatic disease, a significant cause of mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether intervention to metastatic lesions, in pts initially presenting with stage I–III BC, impacts overall survival (OS) and post-distant recurrence survival (PDRS). METHODS: This is a singleinstitution retrospective study of 201 pts with stage I–III BC, who subsequently develop metastatic lesions to the liver, lung, and/or bone, from 2006-2016. The cohorts included pts receiving intervention to their metastases (IM, n=100) versus no intervention to their metastases (NI, n=101). Two pts in the IM group were lost to follow up and excluded from the survival analysis. The primary study outcomes are OS and PDRS. The characteristics of the pts were compared with X2 test. OS curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable analysis by Cox regression. Statistical significance was set at p< 0.05.
  • Conference Object
    Does Locoregional Treatment in De Novo Stage Iv Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer Prolong Survival? an Ongoing Multicenter Registry Study
    (Elsevier, 2019) Soran, Atilla; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Sezgin, Efe; Özbaş, Serdar
    Surgical treatment of primary tumor is a controversial treatment of stage IV de novo metastatic breast cancer (BC). This study aims to present early results of the ongoing reg istry in a cohort of patients.
  • Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 2
    The Effect of Primary Surgery in Patients With Stage Iv Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis Only (protocol Bomet Mf14-01); a Multi-Center, Registry Study
    (Churchill Livingstone, 2021) Soran, Atilla; Doğan, Lütfi; Özbaş, Serdar; Işık, Arda; Trablus, D.; Demirci, U.; Sezgin, Efe
    Goals: More evidence shows that primary surgery for de novo metastatic breast cancer (BC) prolongs overall survival (OS) in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of locoregional treatment (LRT) in BC patients with de novo stage IV bone only metastasis (BOM).
  • Letter
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Reply: the Effect of Primary Surgery in Patients With Stage Iv Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis Only (protocol Bomet Mf 14-01): a Multi-Center, Registry Study
    (Springer, 2021) Soran, Atilla; Sezgin, Efe; Özbaş, Serdar; Doğan, Lütfi
    Dear Editor, We’d like to thank Drs. Ishizuka and Horimoto for their letter to the editor. We’re glad to see their interest to our prospective study. Regarding their recommendation that univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis does not eliminate confounding factors, such as age, tumor size, number of bone metastasis, etc., we employed propensity score methods for the results, including Fig. 1.
  • Letter
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 1
  • Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 83
    Citation - Scopus: 87
    Primary Surgery With Systemic Therapy in Patients With De Novo Stage Iv Breast Cancer: 10-Year Follow-Up; Protocol Mf07-01 Randomized Clinical Trial
    (Elsevier, 2021) Soran, Atilla; Özmen, Vahit; Özbaş, Serdar; Karanlık, Hasan; Müslümanoğlu, Mahmut; İğci, Abdullah; Cantürk, Nuh Zafer; Utkan, Zafer; Evrensel, Türkkan; Sezgin, Efe
    Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) data of patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC) who received locoregional treatment (LRT) over a 10-year follow-up. Study Design: The MF07-01 is a 1:1 multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing the LRT with systemic therapy (ST), where ST was given to all patients either immediately after randomization or after surgical resection of the intact primary tumor. Results: A total of 278 patients were randomized and 265 patients were in the final analysis. At 10-year follow-up, survivals were 19% (95% CI 13%–28%) and 5% (95% CI 2%–12%) in the LRT group and ST group, respectively. Median survival was 46 months for the LRT group and 35 months for the ST group, and hazard of death was 29% lower in the LRT group compared with the ST group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.59–0.86; p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Patients with a diagnosis of de novo stage IV BC who underwent LRT followed by ST had a 14% higher chance of OS by the end of the 10-year follow-up compared with the patients who received only ST. The longer study follow-up revealed that LRT should be presented to patients when discussing treatment options. © 2021 American College of Surgeons