Computer Engineering / Bilgisayar Mühendisliği
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/10
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Conference Object Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 2Dynamic Itemset Mining Under Multiple Support Thresholds(IOS Press, 2016) Abuzayed, Nourhan; Ergenç Bostanoğlu, Belgin; Ergenç, BelginHandling dynamic aspect of databases and multiple support threshold requirements of items are two important challenges of frequent itemset mining algorithms. Existing dynamic itemset mining algorithms are devised for single support threshold whereas multiple support threshold algorithms assume that the databases are static. This paper focuses on dynamic update problem of frequent itemsets under MIS (Multiple Item Support) thresholds and introduces Dynamic MIS algorithm. It is i) tree based and scans the database once, ii) considers multiple support thresholds, and iii) handles increments of additions, additions with new items and deletions. Proposed algorithm is compared to CFP-Growth++ and findings are; in dynamic database 1) Dynamic MIS performs better than CFP-Growth++ since it runs only on increments and 2) Dynamic MIS can achieve speed-up up to 56 times against CFP-Growth++.Conference Object Citation - Scopus: 2Comparison of Dynamic Itemset Mining Algorithms for Multiple Support Thresholds(Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2017) Abuzayed, Nourhan; Ergenç, BelginMining1 frequent itemsets is an important part of association rule mining process. Handling dynamic aspect of databases and multiple support threshold requirements of items are two important challenges of frequent itemset mining algorithms. Most of the existing dynamic itemset mining algorithms are devised for single support threshold whereas multiple support threshold algorithms are static. This work focuses on dynamic update problem of frequent itemsets under multiple support thresholds and proposes tree-based Dynamic CFP-Growth++ algorithm. Proposed algorithm is compared to our previous dynamic algorithm Dynamic MIS [50] and a recent static algorithm CFP-Growth++ [2] and, findings are; in dynamic database, 1) both of the dynamic algorithms are better than the static algorithm CFP-Growth++, 2) as memory usage performance; Dynamic CFP-Growth++ performs better than Dynamic MIS, 3) as execution time performance; Dynamic MIS is better than Dynamic CFP-Growth++. In short, Dynamic CFP-Growth++ and Dynamic MIS have a trade-off relationship in terms of memory usage and execution time.