Food Engineering / Gıda Mühendisliği

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/12

Browse

Filters

2021 - 20237

Settings

Publisher: search.filters.publisher.SpringerSubject: search.filters.subject.Breast cancer

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Erratum
    Correction: Intervention for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study–imet, Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2023) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Şenol, Kazım; Sezgin, Efe
    The authors‘ given names are correct as reflected here. © Society of Surgical Oncology 2022.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Aso Visual Abstract: Intervention for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients-Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study: Imet; Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2022) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, L.; Şenol, Kazım; Dağ, Ahmet; Karanlık, Hasan; Aytaç, Özgür; Karadeniz Çakmak, Güldeniz; Dalcı, Kubilay; Doğan, Mutlu; Sezer, Atakan Y.; Gökgöz, Şehsuvar; Özyar, Enis; Sezgin, Efe
    The aim of our prospective, multicenter registry study was to investigate the importance of interventions for operable lung and/or liver metastasis for breast cancer (BC) survival (https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12239-z). The results reveal that surgical resection or ablative interventions may contribute to survival in patients with BC with limited number and operable metachronous hepatic/pulmonary metastases. Ultimately, randomized studies will determine whether intervention on lung and liver metastatic sites should be performed. In the meantime, such interventions can be considered on select patients.
  • Conference Object
    Intervention To Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study-Imet; Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2022) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Şenol, Kazım; Dağ, Ahmet; Karanlık, Hasan; Aytaç, Özgür; Karadeniz Çakmak, Güldeniz; Dalcı, Kubilay; Doğan, Mutlu; Sezer, Atakan Y.; Gökgöz, Şehsuvar; Özyar, Enis; Sezgin, Efe
    Background/Objective: One‐fourth of early‐stage breast cancer (BC) becomes metastatic at follow‐up. Limited metastases represents a clinical state of metastatic disease that is limited in the number of metastatic sites and extent of disease, and amenable to metastasis‐directed intervention. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate intervention to limited metastases in lung and/or liver.
  • Conference Object
    Survival Impact of Intervention To Distant Metastatic Lesions in Patients With Breast Cancer
    (Springer, 2022) Abidi, Hira; Ayoade, Oluwaseun; McAuliffe, Priscilla; Johnson, Ronald; Lee, Joanna; Keenan, Donald; Steiman, Jennifer; Sezgin, Efe; Soran, Atilla
    INTRODUCTION: Approximately 25% of patients (pts) with stage I - III breast cancer (BC) develop distant metastatic disease, a significant cause of mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether intervention to metastatic lesions, in pts initially presenting with stage I–III BC, impacts overall survival (OS) and post-distant recurrence survival (PDRS). METHODS: This is a singleinstitution retrospective study of 201 pts with stage I–III BC, who subsequently develop metastatic lesions to the liver, lung, and/or bone, from 2006-2016. The cohorts included pts receiving intervention to their metastases (IM, n=100) versus no intervention to their metastases (NI, n=101). Two pts in the IM group were lost to follow up and excluded from the survival analysis. The primary study outcomes are OS and PDRS. The characteristics of the pts were compared with X2 test. OS curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable analysis by Cox regression. Statistical significance was set at p< 0.05.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 6
    Citation - Scopus: 8
    Intervention for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients: Prospective, Multi-Institutional Registry Study-Imet, Protocol Mf 14-02
    (Springer, 2022) Soran, Atilla; Özbaş, Serdar; Özçınar, Beyza; Işık, Arda; Doğan, Lütfi; Şenol, Kazım; Dağ, Ahmet; Karanlık, Hasan; Aytaç, Özgür; Karadeniz Çakmak, Güldeniz; Dalcı, Kubilay; Doğan, Mutlu; Sezer, Atakan Y.; Gökgöz, Şehsuvar; Özyar, Enis; Sezgin, Efe
    Background: One fourth of early-stage breast cancer cases become metastatic during the follow-up period. Limited metastasis is a metastatic disease condition in which the number of metastatic sites and the extent of the disease both are limited, and the disease is amenable to metastatic intervention. This prospective study aimed to evaluate intervention for limited metastases in the lung, liver, or both. Methods: The study enrolled luminal A/B and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-neu+ patients with operable lung and/or liver metastases in the follow-up assessment after completion of primary breast cancer treatment and patients with a diagnosis of metastasis after 2014. Demographic, clinical, tumor-specific, and metastasis detection-free interval (MDFI) data were collected. Bone metastasis in addition to lung and liver metastases also was included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of treatment for metastases: systemic therapy alone (ST) group or intervention (IT) group.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 63
    Citation - Scopus: 63
    The Effect of Primary Surgery in Patients With De Novo Stage Iv Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis Only (protocol Bomet Mf 14-01): a Multi-Center, Prospective Registry Study
    (Springer, 2021) Soran, Atilla; Doğan, Lütfi; Işık, Arda; Özbaş, Serdar; Trabulus, Didem Can; Demirci, Umut; Sezgin, Efe
    Background More evidence shows that primary surgery for de novo metastatic breast cancer (BC) prolongs overall survival (OS) in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of locoregional treatment (LRT) in BC patients with de novo stage IV bone only metastasis (BOM). Methods The prospective, multicenter registry study BOMET MF14-01 was initiated in May 2014. Patients with de novo stage IV BOM BC were divided into two groups: those receiving systemic treatment (ST group) and those receiving LRT (LRT group). Patients who received LRT were further divided into two groups: ST after LRT (LRT + ST group) and ST before LRT (ST + LRT group). Results We included 505 patients in this study; 240 (47.5%) patients in the ST group and 265 (52.5%) in the LRT group. One hundred and thirteen patients (26.3%) died in the 34-month median follow-up, 85 (35.4%) in the ST group and 28 (10.5%) in LRT group. Local progression was observed in 39 (16.2%) of the patients in the ST group and 18 (6.7%) in the LRT group (p = 0.001). Hazard of death was 60% lower in the LRT group compared with the ST group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.54, p < 0.0001). Conclusion In this prospectively maintained registry study, we found that LRT prolonged survival and decreased locoregional recurrence in the median 3-year follow-up. Timing of primary breast surgery either at diagnosis or after ST provided a survival benefit similar to ST alone in de novo stage IV BOM BC patients.
  • Letter
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Reply: the Effect of Primary Surgery in Patients With Stage Iv Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis Only (protocol Bomet Mf 14-01): a Multi-Center, Registry Study
    (Springer, 2021) Soran, Atilla; Sezgin, Efe; Özbaş, Serdar; Doğan, Lütfi
    Dear Editor, We’d like to thank Drs. Ishizuka and Horimoto for their letter to the editor. We’re glad to see their interest to our prospective study. Regarding their recommendation that univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis does not eliminate confounding factors, such as age, tumor size, number of bone metastasis, etc., we employed propensity score methods for the results, including Fig. 1.