Architecture / Mimarlık
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/24
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Article Ildırı’nın mekansal izlerinin peşinde: Bir 19. Yüzyıl yerleşim bulmacası(Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi TÜBA, 2020) Kul, Fatma Nurşen; Çil, ElaThis paper aims to decipher the 19th century spatial characteristics of Ildırı which overlaps the archaeological remains of ancient Erythrai. This period corresponds to the Ottoman Empire’s last century when Ildırı was inhabited by Orthodox-Rum community. Ildırı experinced serious alterations and destructions during and after the population exchange. Due to both these changes and destructions as well as recent illegal construction activities, the original settlement pattern is almost disappeared in Ildırı. Increasing tourism pressure of recent years in an other factor that accelerates this disappearance. For this reason, in this paper, the spatial characteristics of 19th-century Ildırı is deciphered like a jig-saw puzzle; by tracing the clues about the place from different sources. This settlement puzzle based upon supporting the limited traces coming from the place with oral history studies and narratives of archaeologist travellers. The mentioned oral history studies composed of the narratives of both existing Turkish and former Rum inhabitants. The narratives of Rum inhabitants who experienced the pre-exchange period were obtained from the Centre of Asia Minor Studies in Athens. Interviews with Turkish inhabitants who witnessed the post-exchange period were conducted by the authors at different times between 2012 and 2014 in Ildırı. As the conclusion, the importance of oral history studies is emphasized in understanding the place, its recent history and spatial transformations of the settlements like Ildırı that experienced major transformations as well as a sharp social interruption with population exchange.Article Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 2Mimari Habitusun Eşiği Olarak İlk Yıl Mimari Tasarım Stüdyoları(Middle East Technical University, 2021) Çil, Ela; Demirel Özer, SinemThis study considers the first year design studio, not only as an environment in which knowledge and skills about the profession are transferred, but also as a threshold where students move into a new culture of values and ideas specific to the discipline. The inter-studio interaction between the instructor and the student, which stands out as the basic strategy of studio instructions, plays a critical role in the socialization of students into a new culture. This article is sharing a portion of a research, which is conducted in the architecture faculties of 14 universities in Turkey, and it enables us to discuss the interaction and cultural adaptation taking place in the studio. One of the highlights in the results of the research is the difference between the experience and evaluation of the studio's main objectives from the perspective of instructors and students. This difference sheds light on how the values that are thought to be conveyed in the studio are actually understood by the students. The concept of habitus, which Pierre Bourdieu points out as the limits of action in a culture that are almost beyond the grasp of the consciousness of the members of that culture, and Jacques Ranciere's and Paulo Freire's critical approaches to current pedagogical systems outline the theoretical framework within which we discuss our findings. In addressing architectural education as a form of cultural policy, our goal is to confront the uncertainty that characterizes the first year design studio and create a sphere to debate the challenges that the first year studio culture poses for students and instructors.
