Green Biohydrogen Production From Renewable Plant-Based Resources: a Comparative Evaluation

dc.contributor.author Goren,A.Y.
dc.contributor.author Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur
dc.contributor.author Dincer,I.
dc.contributor.author Khalvati,A.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-05T14:59:34Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-05T14:59:34Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Increasing energy demand drives the need for environmentally sustainable and economically viable renewable resources to eliminate problems related to greenhouse gas emissions. In recent years, research on biohydrogen (bio-H2) production as a renewable energy source has been recognized as a potential subject. It aims to reduce the pressures set by carbon dioxide emissions and the depletion of fossil fuel supplies. The field of bio-H2 science is considered potentially important; there have been increasing efforts to develop feasible systems for viable applications. This review further presents an updated and comprehensive review of bio-H2 production by dark fermentation (DF), photofermentation (PF), microbial electrolysis cells (MEC), and hybrid processes using plant-based materials. Among these processes, the highest H2 production yield of 680.8 mLH2/g-biomass was obtained using the DF-PF hybrid process. A comparison of bio-H2 production yields, the environmental impact, and the costs of DF, PF, MEC, and hybrid systems is considered, and superior performance was obtained for integrated biological processes. The comparative evaluation results showed that the MEC process is the most economical technology, followed by integrated systems. The PF is the most environmentally friendly H2 production process, presenting the lowest global warming potential (GWP) value of 1.88 kgCO2eq./kgH2 and acidification potential (AP) of 3,61 gSO2/kgH2 ; it is followed by DF and MEC processes. On the other hand, the highest GWP of 14.8 kgCO2eq./kgH2 and AP 103 gSO2/kg H2 were obtained for the DF-MEC process related to electrical and heat requirements during the production process. Furthermore, the WCP and WSF values were 84.5 and 3632.9 m3 for the DF-MEC integrated process due to the water utilization in anode and cathode solutions, while WCP was 2.91 m3 for the DF process. Overall, the results of this study further revealed that substantial effort, in the current and future, should be performed on bio-H2 production from plant-based biomass using integrated biological processes. Moreover, the bibliometric analysis presented that bio-H2 production from plant-based materials, MEC systems utilization, and nano-additives are growing areas in the bio-H2 research that provide zero-carbon energy in the future. © 2024 The Institution of Chemical Engineers en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.psep.2024.03.056
dc.identifier.issn 0957-5820
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85189067772
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.03.056
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14412
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Institution of Chemical Engineers en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Process Safety and Environmental Protection en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Biohydrogen en_US
dc.subject Bioprocesses en_US
dc.subject Crop residue en_US
dc.subject Economic assessment en_US
dc.subject Energy crop en_US
dc.subject Renewable energy, Biomass, Sustainability en_US
dc.title Green Biohydrogen Production From Renewable Plant-Based Resources: a Comparative Evaluation en_US
dc.type Review en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 56329481700
gdc.author.scopusid 56278550500
gdc.author.scopusid 58567249500
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::review
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Goren A.Y., Clean Energy Research Laboratory (CERL), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech. University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, L1G 0C5, ON, Canada, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Environmental Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir, 35430, Turkey; Dincer I., Clean Energy Research Laboratory (CERL), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech. University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, L1G 0C5, ON, Canada; Khalvati A., Viona Consulting INC., Agro-Environmental Innovation and Technology, Research and Development Company, Thornhill, L3T 0C6, ON, Canada en_US
gdc.description.endpage 977 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Diğer en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 947 en_US
gdc.description.volume 185 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4393029088
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001240224500001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 14.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.9042884E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 8.541791E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 7.74950233
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.96
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 6
gdc.plumx.mendeley 60
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 17
gdc.scopus.citedcount 17
gdc.wos.citedcount 16
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 41435986-875e-4288-988e-9bfda779c33a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4016-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files