A Review of Boron Removal From Aqueous Solution Using Carbon-Based Materials: an Assessment of Health Risks
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Carbon-based compounds have gained attention of researchers for use in boron removal due to their properties, which make them a viable and low cost adsorbent with a high availability, as well as environmental friendliness and high removal efficiency. The removal of boron utilizing carbon-based materials, including activated carbon (AC), graphene oxide (GO), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), is extensively reviewed in this paper. The effects of the operating conditions, kinetics, isotherm models, and removal methods are also elaborated. The impact of the modification of the lifetime of carbon-based materials has also been explored. Compared to unmodified carbon based materials, modified materials have a significantly higher boron adsorption capability. It has been observed that adding various elements to carbon-based materials improves their surface area, functional groups, and pore volume. Tartaric acid, one of these doped elements, has been employed to successfully improve the boron removal and adsorption capabilities of materials. An assessment of the health risk posed to humans by boron in treated water utilizing carbon-based materials was performed to better understand the performance of materials in real-world applications. Furthermore, the boron removal effectiveness of carbon-based materials was evalu ated, as well as any shortcomings, future perspectives, and gaps in the literature.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Activated carbon, Carbon nanotubes, Graphene oxide, Boron removal, Risk assessment, Kinetics, Nanotubes, Carbon, Humans, Water, Adsorption, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Boron
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
27
Source
Volume
293
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 21
Scopus : 36
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 48
Google Scholar™


