Utilization of Stalk Waste Separated During Processing of Sun-Dried Figs (ficus Carica) as a Source of Pectin: Extraction and Determination of Molecular and Functional Properties
Loading...
Date
Authors
Çavdaroğlu, Elif
Yemenicioğlu, Ahmet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study aimed the utilization of fig stalk waste as an alternative pectin source. For this purpose, the characteristics of extracted stalk waste pectin (SP) were compared with those of citrus pectin (CP) and pectin extracted from defected substandard whole sun-dried figs (FP). The SP had a higher extraction yield (11.7%) than FP (9.4%). The galacturonic acid content and degree of esterification of SP (32.3 and 50.1%) were higher than those of FP (19.9 and 38.8%), but lower than those of CP (79.3 and 56.2%), respectively. The SP and CP had different sugar compositions (D-glucose, L-rhamnose, D-galactose and L-arabinose) and weight average molecular weights, but similar FTIR profiles. The SP showed almost 1.9 and 1.6-fold higher Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), and 2.7 and 2.0-fold higher water absorption capacity than CP and FP, respectively. SP at 3% (w/w) showed the second highest viscosity after CP and the highest emulsion stability. Gels of SP and CP at 1.75–3% range had similar firmness, but SP formed more fracturable gels than CP. Sun-dried fig stalk waste is a better source of pectin than defected substandard whole sun-dried figs. The SP could be utilized to develop functional food with alternative textural and rheological properties.
Description
Keywords
Acidic extraction, Citrus pectin, Fig pectin, Functional properties, Fig stalk
Fields of Science
0404 agricultural biotechnology, 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences, 0405 other agricultural sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
15
Volume
154
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 16
Scopus : 21
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 43
SCOPUS™ Citations
21
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
17
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Page Views
1799
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Downloads
733
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Google Scholar™



