A Comparative Study of Mid-Infrared, Uv-Visible and Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Combination With Chemometrics for the Detection of Adulteration of Fresh Olive Oils With Old Olive Oils
| dc.contributor.author | Uncu, Oğuz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Uncu, Oğuz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özen, Banu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özen, Fatma Banu | |
| dc.coverage.doi | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.013 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-18T08:34:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-18T08:34:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The work aimed to detect and quantify adulteration of fresh olive oils with old olive oils from the previous harvest year by using different spectroscopic approaches in combination with chemometrics. Adulterated samples prepared in varying concentrations (10.50%(v/v)) were analyzed with fluorescence, Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR), and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopic methods. Orthogonal partial least square-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and partial least squares (PLS) regression techniques were used for the differentiation of adulterated oils from the pure oils and prediction of adulteration levels, respectively. After the application of various pre-treatment methods, all of the OPLS-DA classification models generated for every spectroscopic technique successfully differentiated adulterated and non-adulterated oils with over 90% correct classification rate. FT-IR + UV-vis and fluorescence spectral data were also successfully used to predict adulteration levels with high coefficient of determinations for both calibration (0.94 and 0.98) and prediction (0.91 and 0.97) models and low error values for calibration (4.22% and 2.68%), and prediction (5.20% and 2.82%), compared to individual FT-IR and UV-vis spectroscopy were obtained. Therefore, FT-IR + UV-vis and fluorescence spectroscopy as being fast and environmentally friendly tools have great potential for both classification and quantification of adulteration practices involving old olive oil. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.013 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0956-7135 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1873-7129 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85067305763 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.013 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/8919 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Food Control | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Olive oil | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adulteration | en_US |
| dc.subject | FTIR spectroscopy | en_US |
| dc.subject | UV-vis spectroscopy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fluorescence spectroscopy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chemometrics | en_US |
| dc.title | A Comparative Study of Mid-Infrared, Uv-Visible and Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Combination With Chemometrics for the Detection of Adulteration of Fresh Olive Oils With Old Olive Oils | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Uncu, Oğuz | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Özen, Banu | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C3 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C3 | |
| gdc.coar.access | metadata only access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Food Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 218 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 209 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 105 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2951992594 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000477691300027 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | BRONZE | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 43.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 5.8709975E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 5.848801E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0404 agricultural biotechnology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0405 other agricultural sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 6.76241835 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.98 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 77 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 63 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 140 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 104 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 103 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 82 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9ed811bc-7431-41d7-81f5-4e572157a5ae | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4019-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 1-s2.0-S0956713519302683-main.pdf
- Size:
- 722.74 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
