Mechanical Properties of Palygorskite Clay Stabilized With Polyelectrolytes

dc.contributor.author Huang, Jianxin
dc.contributor.author Makhatova, Ardak
dc.contributor.author Kogbara, Reginald
dc.contributor.author Masad, Eyad
dc.contributor.author Sukhishvili, Svetlana
dc.contributor.author Little, Dallas
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-11T08:56:16Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-11T08:56:16Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract Two polyelectrolytes of opposite charges, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) and polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDADMAC), were investigated to stabilize palygorskite clay at varying dosages of 0.2, 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 % by the dry weight of the soil. Both PSS and PDADMAC improved the unconfined compressive strength of the palygorskite clay. PSS was effective at all the polymer contents studied after 7 days of dry curing and the strength increased with the dosages of PSS added, ranging from 2 MPa (0.2 % PSS) to 3.1 MPa (3.2 % PSS), compared with 1.5 MPa of the untreated soil. PDADMAC, on the other hand, showed comparable strength improvements as PSS did at the high polymer contents of 1.6 and 3.2 % but did not work at 0.2 and 0.8 % dosages. Under wet curing at 100 % relative humidity, PSS improved the strength of the clay by 40 % (620 kPa at 0.2 % PSS) to 77 % (764 kPa at 1.6 % PSS) compared to the untreated clay (440 kPa). PDADMAC exhibited less improvement than PSS under wet conditions but still worked at dosages of 0.8 and 1.6 %. Besides strength, the resilient modulus and fracture toughness of the treated specimens increased by approximately 10 % and 66 %, respectively, when treated with 1.6 % PSS, which was the optimum content based on the strength results. PDADMAC-treated palygorskite, however, exhibited cracking during curing for both tests, showing potential drying crack issues. The adsorption of PSS and PDADMAC on palygorskite clay were also measured using ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, and binding between these polymers and palygorskite has been confirmed. The measured adsorption capacities of PSS and PDADMAC were comparable (2.9 and 2.7 mg/g, respectively), while the PSS was somewhat more efficient in improving soil mechanical properties. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This publication was made possible by a National Priorities Research Program grant (NPRP13S–0124–200160: Innovative Techniques for Stabilization of Qatari Soils and Petroleum Drill Cuttings Using Organic Polymers) from the Qatar National Research Fund, a member of the Qatar Foundation. The findings herein reflect the work of the authors and are solely the responsibility of the authors. The authors would like to thank Dr. Anand Puppala and his research team at Texas A&M University for allowing the authors to use his laboratory for the resilient modulus test and the kind help they provided during the tests. The assistance of Dr. Yong-Rak Kim and his team at Texas A&M University in conducting the semicircular bending tests is greatly appreciated. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101124
dc.identifier.issn 2214-3912
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85173432186
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101124
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14020
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Transportation Geotechnics en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Fracture toughness en_US
dc.subject Palygorskite en_US
dc.subject Polyelectrolyte en_US
dc.subject Resilient modulus en_US
dc.subject Unconfined compressive strength en_US
dc.title Mechanical Properties of Palygorskite Clay Stabilized With Polyelectrolytes en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Kogbara, Reginald
gdc.author.scopusid 57249133500
gdc.author.scopusid 57207858807
gdc.author.scopusid 14070237400
gdc.author.scopusid 7003647509
gdc.author.scopusid 6603714011
gdc.author.scopusid 7202966398
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineering en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.volume 43 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4387249674
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001091804000001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 3.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.7931553E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.5107115E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.22704191
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.72
gdc.opencitations.count 3
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 4
gdc.plumx.mendeley 11
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 5
gdc.scopus.citedcount 5
gdc.wos.citedcount 5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a4a9c582-99dc-4865-9846-99be1635f69f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4016-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
1-s2.0-S2214391223001976-main.pdf
Size:
7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format