Small Wins in Practice: Learnings From 16 European Initiatives Working Towards the Transformation of Urban Food Systems
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, we examine how 16 initiatives across Europe are addressing 'wicked' food system issues by mobilising local networks and implementing small-scale but impactful changes in urban and peri-urban regions. To map the potential of these initiatives to contribute to large-scale change, we apply the Small Wins Framework proposed by Termeer & Dewulf (2019). By analysing data collected through interviews with participants working on initiatives spanning 13 cities across 9 European countries, we identify the manifestation of six propelling mechanisms that signal the capacity of small wins to bring about systemic change. Findings from this study reveal the presence of most mechanisms across the included initiatives. However, the ways in which these mechanisms appear depend on various factors such as stakeholder motivation, the maturity of the initiative, the need for additional funding, local food culture, and the regional and national political landscape among others. Our analysis indicates that the Small Wins Framework could be successfully used as a mapping tool in urban transformation processes, but it is likely to be more effective as a tool for reflexive monitoring rather than ex-post evaluation. Drawing on the impacts of various large-scale disruptions on the initiatives, we suggest that social, political, and economic shocks can present windows of opportunity to accelerate change and that initiatives performing well under such pressure should be supported in their pursuit of systems transformation. Lastly, we recommend non-linear growth strategies such as spreading, deepening, and expanding, as ways to compound the impact of small wins.
Description
Keywords
Urban food systems, Small wins, Sustainability, Wicked problems, Evaluation paradox, Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified, Sustainability, Peace and Conflict Studies, Evaluation paradox, Freds- och konfliktforskning, Urban food systems, Wicked problems, Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap, Small wins
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Volume
129
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 44
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on May 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
2
checked on May 03, 2026
Page Views
78
checked on May 03, 2026
Downloads
6
checked on May 03, 2026
Google Scholar™



