Impact of Transparency in the Design of Protective Structures for Conservation of Archaeological Remains
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
İpekoğlu, Başak
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Protective structures are advantageous to extend the life of exposed remains and to display objects of cultural significance. A considerable number of shelters and enclosures have been constructed of transparent materials to enhance the display function. This study aims to examine the utilization of transparency in design of protective structures in terms of advantages and disadvantages. To fulfill this aim, a group of protective structures, which were completely transparent or with transparent façades, such as the Roman Villa at Piazza Armerina, Sicily (Italy), the Fishbourne Roman Palace at West Sussex (England), the Roman Bath at Badenweiler (Germany), the Cathedral ruins at Hamar (Norway) and the Terrace Houses 2 at Ephesus (Turkey) were investigated in terms of their effect on preservation and display of remains. The selected examples illustrated that greenhouse effect, condensation, loss of transparency and excessive lighting are the problems to be considered in the design process. As a result, transparent materials used in protective structures should be selected carefully according to their thermo-physical properties such as solar, thermal and light transmission in order to reduce the negative effects of overheating and condensation.
Description
Keywords
Archaeological heritage, Conservation, Presentation, Transparency, Protective structures, Protective structures, Archaeological heritage, Conservation, Presentation, Transparency
Fields of Science
0601 history and archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
Yaka Çetin, F., and İpekoğlu, B. (2013). Impact of transparency in the design of protective structures for conservation of archaeological remains. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14(3 SUPPL), e21-e24. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2012.10.019
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Volume
14
Issue
3 SUPPL
Start Page
e21
End Page
e24
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 9
Scopus : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 25
Google Scholar™


