A Comparative Evaluation of Dark Fermentative Bioreactor Configurations for Enhanced Hydrogen Production

dc.contributor.author Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur
dc.contributor.author Dincer, I.
dc.contributor.author Khalvati, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-25T20:01:06Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-25T20:01:06Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Energy from renewable resources has been growing in popularity, which ultimately helps reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and contaminants. Since hydrogen (H2) has a higher combustion production of energy than hydrocarbon fuels, it has been identified as a clean, sustainable, and environmentally friendly energy source. There are several benefits to producing biohydrogen (bioH2) from renewable sources, including lower cost and increased sustainability. Among the bioH2 production processes, dark fermentation supports commercialization and scale-up for industrial applications. This paper considers the various bioreactors, such as anaerobic sequencing batch, continuous stirred, up-flow, fixed-bed, and membrane reactors, and their operational approaches for bioH2 production. This review paper also performs the bibliometric analysis method to identify historical and current developments in a particular field of reactor configuration studies. Furthermore, the main variables influencing reactor performance and methods for increasing process efficiency considering economic and environmental aspects are addressed. The results revealed that continuously stirred reactors are widely utilized for bioH2 production as a cost-effective reactor configuration. Moreover, the membrane bioreactors and fixed-bed reactors are yielded higher bioH2 performance than other configurations. Nevertheless, high energy consumption and costs have presented the need for further development of reactors. Consequently, future recommendations to solve the critical problems faced in reactor configurations, the gaps in the literature, and the points that need improvement were comprehensively reported. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11356-024-35873-4
dc.identifier.issn 0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn 1614-7499
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85217164551
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35873-4
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/15402
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Science and Pollution Research en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Biohydrogen Production en_US
dc.subject Biomass en_US
dc.subject Dark Fermentation en_US
dc.subject Reactor Configuration en_US
dc.subject Reactor Design en_US
dc.title A Comparative Evaluation of Dark Fermentative Bioreactor Configurations for Enhanced Hydrogen Production en_US
dc.type Review en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 56329481700
gdc.author.scopusid 56278550500
gdc.author.scopusid 58567249500
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::review
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineering en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Goren A.Y., Clean Energy Research Laboratory (CERL), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, L1G 0C5, ON, Canada, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Environmental Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Türkiye; Dincer I., Clean Energy Research Laboratory (CERL), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, L1G 0C5, ON, Canada; Khalvati A., Viona Consulting Inc, Agro-Environmental Innovation and Technology, Research and Development Company, Thornhill, L3T 0C6, ON, Canada en_US
gdc.description.endpage 2209
gdc.description.publicationcategory Diğer en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 2182
gdc.description.volume 32
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4406184166
gdc.identifier.pmid 39777599
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 2.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.6767766E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Bioreactors
gdc.oaire.keywords Biofuels
gdc.oaire.keywords Fermentation
gdc.oaire.keywords Hydrogen
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1224832E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 13.5288794
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.95
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 20
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 5
gdc.scopus.citedcount 5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 41435986-875e-4288-988e-9bfda779c33a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4016-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
s11356-024-35873-4.pdf
Size:
1.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
article