Arsenite Removal From Groundwater by Aerated Electrocoagulation Reactor With Al Ball Electrodes: Human Health Risk Assessment
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
0
OpenAIRE Views
1
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The application of conventional electrocoagulation (EC) process for removal of As(III) from groundwater suffers from the need of external oxidation agent for oxidation of As(III) to As(V). To tackle this limitation, an aerated EC reactor for the removal of As(III) from groundwater was evaluated in this study. The effect of initial pH(i), air flow rate, applied current, and electrode height in the EC reactor was examined. The experimental results showed that removal of arsenic mostly dependent on the applied current, electrode height in EC reactor, and air flow rate. The As(III) removal efficiency (99.2%) was maximum at pH(i) of 7.5, air flow rate of 6 L min(-1), applied current of 0.30 A, and electrode height in EC reactor of 5 cm, with an total operating cost of 0.583 $ m(-3). Furthermore, the carcinogenic risk (CR) and non-carcinogenic risk of arsenic (As) was in the range of tolerable limits at all operating conditions except applied current of 0.075 A at the end of the aerated EC process to remove As from groundwater. The present EC reactor process is able to remove As(III) from groundwater to below 10 mu g L-1, which is maximum contaminant level of arsenic in drinking water according to the World Health Organization (WHO). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Arsenite, Electrocoagulation, Aerated reactor, Al ball electrodes, Risk assessment, Arsenites, Risk Assessment, Arsenic, Water Purification, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Electrodes, Groundwater, Oxidation-Reduction, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Aluminum
Fields of Science
01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
38
Source
Chemosphere
Volume
251
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 39
Scopus : 40
PubMed : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 77
SCOPUS™ Citations
40
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
37
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
834
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
364
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


