Modernlik Söylemi: Endişeli Bakışlarda Modern Birey
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Talu, Nilüfer
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
19. yüzyılın son çeyreğinden günümüze, modernlik ve modern hayatın eleştirileri pek çok farklı disiplin üzerinden klasik teorik yazılar, imgeler, kültürel nesneler, mimari pratikler, bilimsel ve bilimsel olmayan makaleler gibi sayısız metin üzerinden beslenmektedir (1). Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyal bir durum olarak modernliği, farklı disiplinlerde üretilmiş çeşitli metinleri ile ve eşliğinde, modern bireyine odaklanarak bir söylem olarak ele almak ve analiz etmektir. Yapılan söylem analizi Michel Foucault’nun (1926-1984) Bilginin Arkeolojisi (L’archéologie du Savoir) (1969) adlı eserinde geliştirdiği kuramsal tartışma üzerine temellendirilmiştir. Temel olarak Foucaultgil bakış, eylemleri, sözleri, yazıları, imgeleri kapsayan ayrıştırılmış ifade grupları ve düzenlenmiş pratikler aracılığı ile toplumsal yaşam üzerinde bir anlam, bir etki, bir algı yaratılışının mekanizmalarını araştırır. Foucault çeşitli ve birbirinden farklı metinlerin nasıl bir araya gelerek belli bir bakış açısını ve bir söylemi oluşturduğu üzerine odaklanır.
Modernity and modern life met with critique starting from the last quarter of the nineteenth century and continuing to the present through countless texts including classical theoretical writings, images, cultural objects, architectural practices, works of art, literary works, scientific and unscientific articles, reviews, movies, letters, lectures, etc. Regardless of whether they are discursive or not, these texts construct a point of view and a particular meaning concerning the mental health of the modern individual. In other words, the general domain of all these texts has produced a 'discourse' that says that the conditions of modern life and of the metropolis/megalopolis return to the modern individual as negative dialectics between 'the subject and the object', 'the self and the other', 'freedom and security', 'standardization and individualization' and 'individual and social'. This study aims to analyse modernity as a discourse focusing on its modern individual. Discourse is here meant the notion that takes central part in Michel Foucault's (1926-1984) fundamental theoretical argument.
Modernity and modern life met with critique starting from the last quarter of the nineteenth century and continuing to the present through countless texts including classical theoretical writings, images, cultural objects, architectural practices, works of art, literary works, scientific and unscientific articles, reviews, movies, letters, lectures, etc. Regardless of whether they are discursive or not, these texts construct a point of view and a particular meaning concerning the mental health of the modern individual. In other words, the general domain of all these texts has produced a 'discourse' that says that the conditions of modern life and of the metropolis/megalopolis return to the modern individual as negative dialectics between 'the subject and the object', 'the self and the other', 'freedom and security', 'standardization and individualization' and 'individual and social'. This study aims to analyse modernity as a discourse focusing on its modern individual. Discourse is here meant the notion that takes central part in Michel Foucault's (1926-1984) fundamental theoretical argument.
Description
Keywords
Discourse analysis, Foucaudian discourse, Modern life, Homesickness, Homelessness, Alienation, Alienation, Homesickness, Homelessness, Discourse analysis, Foucaudian discourse, Modern life
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
Talu, N. (2010). Modernli̇k söylemi̇: Endi̇şeli̇ bakışlarda modern bi̇rey. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 27(2), 141-171. doi:10.4305/METU.JFA.2010.2.8
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Volume
27
Issue
2
Start Page
141
End Page
171
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 25
Google Scholar™


