Prediction of Microdrill Breakage Using Rough Sets
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study attempts to correlate the nonlinear invariants’ with the changing conditions of a drilling process through a series of condition monitoring experiments on small diameter (1 mm) drill bits. Run-to-failure tests are performed on these drill bits, and vibration data are consecutively gathered at equal time intervals. Nonlinear invariants, such as the Kolmogorov entropy and correlation dimension, and statistical parameters are calculated based on the corresponding conditions of the drill bits. By intervariations of these values between two successive measurements, a drop–rise table is created.
Any variation that is within a certain threshold (+-20% of the measurements in this case) is assumed to be constant. Any fluctuation above or below is assumed to be either a rise or a drop. The reduct and conflict tables then help eliminate incongruous and redundant data by the use of rough sets (RSs). Inconsistent data, which by definition is the boundary re-gion, are classified through certainty and coverage factors. By handling inconsistencies and redundancies, 11 rules are ex-tracted from 39 experiments, representing the underlying rules. Then 22 new experiments are used to check the validity of the rule space. The RS decision frame performs best at predicting no failure cases. It is believed that RSs are superior in dealing with real-life data over fuzzy set logic in that actual measured data are never as consistent as here and may dominate the monitoring of the manufacturing processes as it becomes more widespread.
Description
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Sevil, H. E., and Özdemir, S. (2011). Prediction of microdrill breakage using rough sets. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 25(1), 15-23. doi:10.1017/S0890060410000144
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM
Volume
25
Issue
1
Start Page
15
End Page
23
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 8
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
3
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Page Views
868
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Downloads
352
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


