The Influence of Low Energy Impacts on the Static and Dynamic Response of a Foam Core Composite Wing
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This work describes damage detection efforts on a composite wing subject to a series of low-energy (ĝ̂1/47 J) impacts. Two airfoils with fundamentally different damage scenarios were considered. The first damage scenario produced no visible signs of damage on the wing surface following eight impacts. A duplicate wing, subjected to a similar series of impacts, was investigated using flash thermography and subsequently autopsied. The flash thermography showed small, localized damage in the skin, but gave no information about core damage. The autopsy showed core/skin disbonding at both interfaces that varied with the number of impacts, core crushing, and a through the core shear crack. No clear changes to the static or dynamic wing response were observed for this scenario. The second damage scenario involved cracking of the wing skin. While damage quantification was not undertaken for this scenario, both static and dynamic changes in wing response were observed. An analytical model of the wing is presented which helps explain the observed behaviors of the two damage scenarios.
Description
Keywords
Damage detection, Delamination, Fiber optic sensors, Low velocity impact damage, Non-destructive testing, Structural health monitoring, Structural health monitoring, Fiber optic sensors, Low velocity impact damage, Delamination, Non-destructive testing, Damage detection
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0101 mathematics, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Aktaş, E., Seaver, M., Nichols, J. M., Trickey, S. T., and Davis, W. R. (2009). The influence of low energy impacts on the static and dynamic response of a foam core composite wing. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 20(11), 1351-1361. doi:10.1177/1045389X08095184
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Volume
20
Issue
11
Start Page
1351
End Page
1361
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 6
Google Scholar™


