Comparative Analysis of Estimation of Slope-Length Gradient (ls) Factor for Entire Afghanistan
| dc.contributor.author | Ansari, Ahmad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tayfur, Gökmen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-27T19:50:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-27T19:50:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Slope length gradient (LS) is one of the crucial factors in the Universal Soil Loss Equations (USLE, RUSLE). This study aimed at estimating the slope-length and slope-steepness (LS) factor for the entire watersheds of Afghanistan by using three different methods, namely; (1) LS-TOOLMFD (Method 1); (2) The Method of Equations (Method 2); and (3) The approach of Moore and Burch (Method 3). The first method uses the digital elevation model (DEM) in the ASCII format, and the other two methods use the DEM in the spatial domain. The results show that the LS-factor of the study area ranges from 0.01 to 44.31, with a mean of 5.24 and standard deviation of 6.95, according to Method 1; 0.03 to 163.49, with a mean of 9.6 and standard deviation of 13.58, according to Method 2; and 0 to 3985, with a mean of 7.16 and standard deviation of 29.7, according to Method 3. The study reveals that Methods 1 and 2 are more appropriate than Method 3 because Method 3 yields high LS-factor values close to or at streamlines located near mountainous regions. The highest LS values are found to be in the northeast, north, and central regions of Afghanistan, which is consistent with the high mountains and deep valley geomorphology, indicating that these regions are particularly vulnerable to soil erosion by rainfall-runoff processes. The sediment delivery ratio (SDR) for the Upper-Helmand River Basin (Upper-HRB) is also estimated by the RUSLE, employing the LS factors produced by the three methods. The results revealed that the average annual soil loss is found to be, respectively, 9.3, 18.2, and 11.1 (ton/ha/year) by using the three methods, corresponding to SDR of 23.5%, 12.1%, and 19.9%. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/19475705.2023.2200890 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1947-5705 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1947-5713 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85153046069 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2200890 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/13613 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Soil erosion | en_US |
| dc.subject | Slope length | en_US |
| dc.subject | LS factor | en_US |
| dc.subject | DEM | en_US |
| dc.subject | GIS | en_US |
| dc.subject | Afghanistan | en_US |
| dc.subject | Erosion | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparative Analysis of Estimation of Slope-Length Gradient (ls) Factor for Entire Afghanistan | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-9712-4031 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0003-1988-1015 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-9712-4031 | en_US |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0003-1988-1015 | en_US |
| gdc.author.institutional | Tayfur, Gökmen | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 58190963100 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 6701638605 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 1 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 14 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4366280650 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000970019500001 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | true | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 18.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 3.1994087E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | DEM | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Environmental sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | HD61 | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | slope length | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Soil erosion | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | slope | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | GE1-350 | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Risk in industry. Risk management | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | slope steepness | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | LS factor | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | TD1-1066 | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.2794111E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 01 natural sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0105 earth and related environmental sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 5.29179072 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.94 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 17 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 1 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 47 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 19 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 19 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 16 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c04aa74a-2afd-4ce1-be50-e0f634f7c53d | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4020-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Comparative-analysis-of-estimation.pdf
- Size:
- 6 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
