Economical Assessment of Different Hvac Systems for an Operating Room: Case Study for Different Turkish Climate Regions
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, the annual energy consumptions of four different heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems serving to operation rooms (ORs) located at five different cities (Izmir, Antalya, Istanbul, Ankara and, Erzurum) in Turkey are analyzed. The study is performed for four different HVAC systems: (a) 100% fresh air system (System I), (b) 100% fresh air with half air volume rate at night period (System II), (c) 100% fresh air with half air volume rate at night period and heat recovery unit (System III), (d) 50% fresh air with half air volume rate at night period and with heat recovery and mixing units (System IV). Life cycle cost (LCC) for 20 years life span is calculated for the considered systems. It is found that System IV considerably reduces energy consumption and it is economically proper for the considered cities. The rate of energy consumption and LCC reductions are greater for the cities with extreme climate condition having relatively low specific humidity ratio. Using System IV instead of System I reduces OR energy consumption by 74% for the city of Erzurum which has a cold and dry climate.
Description
Keywords
Energy analysis, Energy consumption, HVAC system, Life cycle cost, Air conditioning, Energy consumption, HVAC system, Air conditioning, Energy analysis, Life cycle cost
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Özyoğurtçu, G., Mobedi, M., and Özerdem, B. (2011). Economical assessment of different HVAC systems for an operating room: Case study for different Turkish climate regions. Energy and Buildings. 43(7), 1536-1543. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.013
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
25
Source
Volume
43
Issue
7
Start Page
1536
End Page
1543
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 9
Scopus : 25
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 53
Google Scholar™


