A General Evaluation on Double Skin Facades
Loading...
Date
2014
Authors
Basaran, Tahsin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Yildiz Technical Univ, Fac Architecture
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study examines the literature of double-skin facade systems over the last decade, and, with the help of tables and graphics, investigates their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, a detailed comparison is made between double skin faade systems. The results of the study show that the greatest advantage (95%) of double skin facade systems is their provision of natural ventilation. Other advantages are highlighted according to their percentage as follows: An increase in interaction between user and environment because of the high proportion of transparency, support of heat and sound insulation, reduction in heat transmission and solar heat gain coefficient, an increase in thermal comfort, allowance of solar control elements between the two facade spaces, and protection of these elements from external environment conditions. The most commonly accepted disadvantage (72%) is overheating in the air space of the two facades. Other disadvantages are highlighted according to their percentage as follows: Problems related to a decrease in the amount of daylight entering the building, high investment costs, additional maintenance and repair costs, fire, and acoustic problems. In our country, architectural design decisions related to overheating must be taken so as to provide a positive contribution to energy performance and the applicability of these systems.
Description
Keywords
Double Skin Facades, Advantages Of Double Skin Facades, Disadvantages Of Double Skin Facades, Double Skin Facade Types, HT165.5-169.9, Architecture, Double skin facades; advantages of double skin facades; disadvantages of double skin facades; double skin façade types., NA1-9428, City planning
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Source
MEGARON / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal
Volume
9
Issue
2
Start Page
132
End Page
142
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
Google Scholar™


