Effect of Different Acidity Modifications on the Activity and Selectivity on H-Zsm5 Zeolites in N-Butene Isomerization
Loading...
Files
Date
2014
Authors
Yılmaz, Selahattin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
H-ZSM-5 was modified by silylation [tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and triaminopropyltriethoxysilane], alkali (NaOH), acid (HCl) and ammoniumhexafluorosilicate (AHFS) treatments. The parent and modified zeolite forms were tested in n-butene isomerization. Modifications affected total acidities, the strength of the acid sites, pore sizes and surface areas of the H-ZSM-5 differently. The modifications decreased the conversion obtained by the parent catalyst. TEOS and alkali modifications did not promote formation of isobutene. Pre-alkali treatment before acid treatment increased selectivity to isobutene from 56.0 to 66.7 %, while conversion changed a little, it dropped from 52 to 50 %. AHFS modification provided the highest enhancement in selectivity to isobutene (87.5 %) for which n-butene conversion was dropped by about 10 % compared to H-ZSM-5. This was attributed to a slight modification of the pore size and to the reduction in strong and weak acid sites and generation of new Lewis acid sites.
Description
Keywords
Acidity, H-ZSM5, Isobutene, Isomerization, Modification, Butenes, Isomerization, Isobutene, Acidity, H-ZSM5, Butenes, Modification
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences, 0104 chemical sciences
Citation
Kılıç, E., and Yılmaz, S. (2014). Effect of different acidity modifications on the activity and selectivity on H-ZSM5 zeolites in n-butene isomerization. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, 112(1), 283-294. doi:10.1007/s11144-014-0681-7
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
9
Source
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
Volume
112
Issue
1
Start Page
283
End Page
294
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 5
Scopus : 11
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 12
SCOPUS™ Citations
11
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
11
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
960
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
576
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


