Influence of Microstructure on the Rheological Behavior of Dense Particle Gels
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Rheological measurements are performed on highly concentrated alumina gels. By using an in situ mechanism based on enzyme-catalyzed internal reactions, we are able to form gels of highly concentrated particles without disturbing the microstructures that develop during the gelation process. These gels are produced by two different destabilization mechanisms: Either the pH of the suspension is shifted toward the isoelectric point (ΔpH method) or the ionic strength of the suspension is increased at a constant pH (ΔI method). The two destabilization mechanisms lead to gels of significantly different microstructures. We find notable differences in the rheological behavior of the two systems, suggesting a bond-bending mechanism for stress transmission in the case of ΔpH gels and a bond-stretching mechanism in the case of ΔI gels. In addition, for both kinds of gels we compare the in situ properties to those obtained after altering the microstructure by shearing. Results suggest an increase in elastic and yield properties of concentrated particle gels with decreasing homogeneity of their microstructures.
Description
Keywords
Alumina, Catalysis, Destabilization mechanism, Gelation processes, Stress transmission, Microstructure, Stress transmission, Destabilization mechanism, Alumina, Gelation processes, Microstructure, Catalysis
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Wyss, H.M., Deliormanlı, A.M., Tervoort, E.V., and Gauckler, L.J. (2005). Influence of microstructure on the rheological behavior of dense particle gels. AIChE Journal, 21(1), 134-141. doi:10.1002/aic.10296
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
21
Source
Volume
51
Issue
1
Start Page
134
End Page
141
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 21
Scopus : 23
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 34
SCOPUS™ Citations
23
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
19
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Page Views
614
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Downloads
525
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Google Scholar™


