Comparison of the Rermineralisation Effect of a Glass Ionomer Cement Versus a Resin Composite on Dentin of Primary Teeth
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (G/C) and a composite resin with caries affected dentin and to determine the remineralization levels. Materials and Methods In a split Mouth deSign 24 GIC and composite resin atraumatic restorative treatment restorations were made in vivo and the teeth were collected after 2 years and subsequently settioned and examined using Vickers microhardness test; the latter was performed starting from the dentin surfate adjacent to the restoration. Repeated Measure ANOVA and Bonferroni Statistical methods were used for data analysis. Results The micrdhardness adjacent to the GIC reStorative material resulted tube significantly higher. Conclusion GIC resulted to be a better restorative material for the remineralization of caries affected dentin, though further studies are necessary for the corroboration of this finding. The GIC restored primary molar dentin had a higher level of remineralizatiOn and GIC could be the material of chdice in pediatric dentistry.
Description
Keywords
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, Composite, Glass Ionomer Cement, Microhardness, Remineralization, Microhardness, remineralization, Composite, Glass ionomer cement, Composite Resins, Microhardness, Glass Ionomer Cements, Tooth Remineralization, Dentin, Humans, Tooth remineralization, Atraumatic restorative treatment, Tooth, Deciduous, Child, Remineralization
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
Aykut Yetkiner, A., Şimşek, D., Eronat, C., and Çiftçioğlu, M. (2014). Comparison of the remineralisation effect of a glass ionomer cement versus a resin composite on dentin of primary teeth. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 15(1), 119-121.
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Volume
15
Issue
2
Start Page
119
End Page
121
URI
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 10
PubMed : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 38
SCOPUS™ Citations
10
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
10
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Page Views
1560
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Downloads
823
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Google Scholar™


