A Comprehensive Study on Burst Pressure Performance of Aluminum Liner for Hydrogen Storage Vessels

dc.contributor.author Kangal, Serkan
dc.contributor.author Sayı, Abdülmecit Harun
dc.contributor.author Ayakdaş, Ozan
dc.contributor.author Kartav, Osman
dc.contributor.author Aydın, Levent
dc.contributor.author Artem, Hatice Seçil
dc.contributor.author Aktaş, Engin
dc.contributor.author Yücetürk, Kutay
dc.contributor.author Tanoğlu, Metin
dc.contributor.author Kandemir, Sinan
dc.contributor.author Beylergil, Bertan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-02T18:16:16Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-02T18:16:16Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract This paper presents a comparative study on the burst pressure performance of aluminum (Al) liner for type-III composite overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs). In the analysis, the vessels were loaded with increasing internal pressure up to the burst pressure level. In the analytical part of the study, the burst pressure of the cylindrical part was predicted based on the modified von Mises, Tresca, and average shear stress criterion (ASSC). In the numerical analysis, a finite element (FE) model was established in order to predict the behavior of the vessel as a function of increasing internal pressure and determine the final burst. The Al pressure vessels made of Al-6061-T6 alloy with a capacity of 5 L were designed. The manufacturing of the metallic vessels was purchased from a metal forming company. The experimental study was conducted by pressurizing the Al vessels until the burst failure occurred. The radial and axial strain behaviors were monitored at various locations on the vessels during loading. The results obtained through analytical, numerical, and experimental work were compared. The average experimental burst pressure of the vessels was found to be 279 bar. The experimental strain data were compared with the results of the FE analysis. The results indicated that the FE analysis and ASSC-based elastoplastic analytical approaches yielded the best predictions which are within 2.2% of the experimental burst failure values. It was also found that the elastic analysis underestimated the burst failure results; however, it was effective for determining the critical regions over the vessel structure. The strain behavior of the vessels obtained through experimental investigations was well correlated with those predicted through FE analysis. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (No. 215M182; Funder ID: 10.13039/501100004410). en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1115/1.4049644
dc.identifier.issn 0094-9930
dc.identifier.issn 1528-8978
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85100839350
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049644
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/11828
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ASME en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Pressure vessels en_US
dc.subject Burst en_US
dc.subject Experimental en_US
dc.subject Validation en_US
dc.subject Analytical en_US
dc.subject Finite element method en_US
dc.subject Metallic vessels en_US
dc.title A Comprehensive Study on Burst Pressure Performance of Aluminum Liner for Hydrogen Storage Vessels en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id 0000-0002-0967-4680
gdc.author.id 0000-0002-5706-2101
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering en_US
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Mechanical Engineering en_US
gdc.description.issue 4 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.volume 143 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.openalex W3123989259
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000669955100012
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 3.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.6976787E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.popularity 4.7033355E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0203 mechanical engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0210 nano-technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.46886604
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.56
gdc.opencitations.count 4
gdc.plumx.mendeley 16
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 7
gdc.scopus.citedcount 7
gdc.wos.citedcount 7
local.message.claim 2022-06-06T14:10:12.909+0300 *
local.message.claim |rp02963 *
local.message.claim |submit_approve *
local.message.claim |dc_contributor_author *
local.message.claim |None *
local.message.claim 2022-06-13T10:59:15.251+0300 *
local.message.claim |rp02364 *
local.message.claim |submit_approve *
local.message.claim |dc_contributor_author *
local.message.claim |None *
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery d0667d07-ffb8-42b7-b62c-6a94ecd39927
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4022-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
Proje_ALL_Compr.2021_Q2.pdf
Size:
2.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format