Investigating a Suitable Empirical Model and Performing Regional Analysis for the Suspended Sediment Load Prediction in Major Rivers of the Aegean Region, Turkey
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
0
OpenAIRE Views
5
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study investigates the appropriateness of four major empirical methods [Lane and Kalinske, Einstein, Brooks, Chang—Simons—Richardson] for predicting suspended sediment loads (SSLs) in three major rivers in the Aegean Region, Turkey. The measured data from 1975 to 2005 were used to test performance of the models. It was found that Brooks method was more appropriate, among the others, for predicting suspended sediment loads from each river. The prediction results of Brooks method were further improved by the use of genetic algorithm (GA_Brooks) optimizing a fitting parameter and showing a comparable performance to those of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and neuro-fuzzy (ANFIS) models for the same rivers. GA_Brooks, ANNs, and ANFIS models can be used for predicting loads at a regional scale. The sensitivity analysis results revealed that suspended and bed material particle diameters affect suspended sediment loads significantly.
Description
Keywords
Aegean region, Brooks method, Empirical methods, Regional analysis, Suspended sediments, Suspended sediments, Brooks method, Empirical methods, Suspended sediment, Aegean region, Regional analysis
Fields of Science
0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Ülke, A., Tayfur, G., and Özkul, S. (2017). Investigating a suitable empirical model and performing regional analysis for the suspended sediment load prediction in major rivers of the Aegean Region, Turkey. Water Resources Management, 31(3), 739-764. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1357-z
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
8
Source
Water Resources Management
Volume
31
Issue
3
Start Page
739
End Page
764
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 8
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
SCOPUS™ Citations
8
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
4
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
744
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
562
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


