Cpt-Based Liquefaction Resistance of Clean and Silty Sands: a Drainage Conditions Based Approach
| dc.contributor.author | Ecemis, Nurhan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Monkul, Mehmet Murat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tütüncü, Yunus Emre | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arik, Mustafa Sezer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-17T08:48:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-17T08:48:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The cone penetration test-based simplified liquefaction triggering evaluations are largely based on linking liquefaction manifestations in the field to cone penetration resistance. These relationships are interpreted in such a way that for given penetration resistance, the liquefaction resistance increases as non-plastic fines content (FC) increases. However, several studies have indicated discrepancies in this relationship. Hence, there is a lag in rational scientific understanding of this observation. In this study, an experimental research program was undertaken to investigate the CPT-based liquefaction assessment by considering the effects of drainage conditions on the relationship between CPT resistance and liquefaction resistance. First, clean sand and silty sands having 5, 15, and 35% FC were tested at different relative densities by stress-controlled cyclic direct simple shear (CDSS) tests to investigate cyclic resistance of silty sand with varying amounts of non-plastic fines. Then, a set of tests involving piezocone penetration (CPTu), seismic CPTu (SCPTu), and direct push permeability (DPPT) were undertaken in a large-scale box filled with the same soils used in the CDSS tests. The large-scale test results quantified the effect of drainage conditions (coefficient of consolidation) on cone penetration resistance. Finally, by combining the CDSS and CPTu test results, an alternative CPT-based liquefaction resistance relationship was proposed by considering the effects of drainage conditions. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10518-022-01501-0 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1570-761X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1570-761X | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-1456 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85137109309 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01501-0 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12757 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Coefficient of consolidation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cone penetration test | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cyclic simple shear test | en_US |
| dc.subject | Relative density | en_US |
| dc.title | Cpt-Based Liquefaction Resistance of Clean and Silty Sands: a Drainage Conditions Based Approach | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0003-3262-8380 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0003-3262-8380 | en_US |
| gdc.author.institutional | Ecemis, Nurhan | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Arik, Mustafa Sezer | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 7980 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 15 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 7957 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 20 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4292702628 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000843418400002 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | HYBRID | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 6.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.860719E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 6.879678E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0211 other engineering and technologies | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.15569016 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.7 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 6 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 10 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 8 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 8 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 7 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9dfb1ea6-67a1-45d6-b10d-f66015b65b0c | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4020-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
