Reconstruction of Archaeological Sites: Principles Practice and Evaluation
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The reconstruction works at archaeological sites need to be approached with caution to prevent disturbing any surviving evidence. This study aims to develop criteria for the evaluation of reconstructions at archaeological sites. The criteria have been developed through review of current international and national conservation charters to help improve reconstruction proposals. These criteria are determined considering the remain scale and the site scale. Accuracy of the reconstruction, avoidance of physical damage, compatibility of materials, distinguishability of the interventions, availability of the interventions for future applications, and reversibility are the criteria concerning the remain scale; limits of the intervention, retainability of the original characteristics of the site, and perception of the reconstruction are the criteria concerning the site scale. These criteria are applied to the reconstruction works realized at the West Stoa of Agora, zmir, Turkey during 1930s, which had to be dismissed and reimplemented in 2000s. The recent reconstruction was applied with compatible materials; the interventions did not damage the original materials and they are distinguishable. This study of the reconstruction presents the latest architectural information, provides a basis for future studies, and is reversible. The reconstructed structure does not falsify the original characteristics, but enables increased perception of the site.
Description
Keywords
Agora, Archaeological site, Evaluation criteria, Reconstruction, Stoa, Archaeological site, Stoa, Evaluation criteria, Reconstruction, Agora
Fields of Science
0601 history and archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts
Citation
Yaka Çetin, F., İpekoğlu, B. and Laroche, D. (2012).Reconstruction of archaeological sites: Principles practice and evaluation. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6(5), 579-603. doi:10.1080/15583058.2011.594931
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
4
Volume
6
Issue
5
Start Page
579
End Page
603
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 28
Google Scholar™


