Effects of Processing on the Properties and Permeability of Pure Gases Through Sol-Gel Silica Membranes
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
N2, O2 and CO2 pure gas permeation through sol-gel derived silica membranes were determined and the effects of processing parameters on the microstructure of the membrane was investigated. Silica sols were prepared in an alcoholic solution by hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS as a function of acid content. The thickness of the silica membranes was determined to be about 2μm and significant infiltration into the support was observed from the SEM pictures. The supported membranes were heat treated in the 50-400°C. The N2 permeabilities of silica membranes varied in the 2.2*10-10-2.7*10-8 mol/m2.s.Pa range for single layer membranes dipped for 10s. in the sol. The CO2 permeability of these membranes varied in the 1.2*10-9-6.95 *10-8 mol/m2.s.Pa range. The sols became viscous and gelled at 50°C in 16 hours. The O2 permeability increased with aging time. The optimum dipping time during processing was determined to be 10 seconds. The increase in the acid content of the sols were observed to increase permeabilities of the membranes significantly.
Description
Keywords
Ceramic, Gas permeation, Membrane, Sol-Gel, Optimization, Catalyzed hydrolysis, Sol-Gel, Optimization, Catalyzed hydrolysis, Gas permeation, Membrane, Ceramic
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Topuz, B., Çiftçioğlu, M., and Çakıcıoğlu Özkan, S. F. (2004). Effects of processing on the properties and permeability of pure gases through sol-gel silica membranes. Key Engineering Materials, 264-268(III), 2187-2190. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.264-268.2187
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Volume
264-268
Issue
III
Start Page
2187
End Page
2190
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 6
Google Scholar™


