A New Dynamical Model of Brainstorming: Linear, Nonlinear, Continuous (simultaneous) and Impulsive (sequential) Cases
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Yılmaz, Oğuz
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
1
OpenAIRE Views
9
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this paper, we extended the linear dynamical model of [Brown, V., Paulus, P. B. (1996). A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 91-114] on two accounts. First, we modelled the sequential type brainstorming using impulsive differential equations by treating each category as an impulse and tested its validity in the two experiments that investigated and demonstrated the beneficial effects of sequential priming and memory in individual brainstorming. Finally, we considered the nonlinear case of brainstorming in writing or brainwriting where dyads exchanged their ideas in a written format and that eliminated negative factors occurring in oral brainstorming (e.g., evaluation apprehension, free-riding, production blocking) and enhanced the upward performance matching, and conducted the second experiment in order to test its validity in this paradigm with the effects of sequential priming and memory. Comparisons showed good agreement between results of experiments and those of the mathematical model.
Description
Keywords
Brainstorming, Dynamical systems, Impulsive differential equations, Memory, Sequential priming, Sequential priming, Impulsive differential equations, Memory, Dynamical systems, Brainstorming
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
Coşkun, H., and Yılmaz, O. (2009). A new dynamical model of brainstorming: Linear, nonlinear, continuous (simultaneous) and impulsive (sequential) cases. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(4), 253-264. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.003
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
14
Volume
53
Issue
4
Start Page
253
End Page
264
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 10
Scopus : 17
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 58
Google Scholar™


