Brief Recommendations Addressing RC Buildings Affected by Earthquakes

dc.contributor.author Dowgala, J.
dc.contributor.author Dönmez, C.
dc.contributor.author Irfanoglu, A.
dc.contributor.author Ozturk, B.
dc.contributor.author Pujol, S.
dc.contributor.author Shah, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-25T15:02:34Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-25T15:02:34Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Because of the past experience in Christchurch, New Zealand, where many reinforced concrete (RC) buildings without critical damage have been demolished after earthquakes, and similar events elsewhere, FEMA and ATC are preparing comprehensive guidelines on how to address an RC building after it undergoes strong ground motion. Those guidelines should be the primary resource for practicing engineers wherever building authorities adopt them. The guidelines are being designed to fit well within the regulatory seismic assessment framework used in the United States and are based on terms and methods defined by ASCE (ASCE, 2017). The recommendations presented here are intended to be a simpler alternative that could help engineers elsewhere and expedite the assessment of RC buildings after a strong earthquake. These are the opinions of the writers. Previous research by Cecen (1979), FEMA 307 (1998), Shah (2021), Monical (2021), and ATC (2021) has shown that well-detailed RC buildings can survive repeated earthquakes without negative changes in performance as long as the effects of the initial motion(s) are limited to flexural cracking, shear cracking controlled by transverse reinforcement, and flexural yielding. These phenomena a) tend not to cause reductions in structural resistance and, consequently, b) tend not to cause increases in earthquake deformation demands either. Nevertheless, after every strong earthquake, scores of RC buildings are questioned throughout the world, even in the absence of critical structural damage. At the same time, too many RC buildings around the world end up being demolished because of earthquake damage to facades, partitions, finishes, and other non-structural building components. These recommendations are presented here as a simplified approach and an alternative to address both of these problems. The recommendations include building interventions of different natures and extents to address both brittle and ductile existing buildings and consider the implications of initial damage on the future performance of both the structure and non-structural components. © 2024, International Association for Earthquake Engineering. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 3006-5933
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105027894442
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/18979
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Association for Earthquake Engineering en_US
dc.relation.ispartof World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.title Brief Recommendations Addressing RC Buildings Affected by Earthquakes en_US
dc.type Book Part en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 56626154000
gdc.author.scopusid 55844351400
gdc.author.scopusid 6506371009
gdc.author.scopusid 7006498404
gdc.author.scopusid 6701803736
gdc.author.scopusid 57210577218
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Dowgala] Jeffrey D., Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., Northbrook, IL, United States; [Dönmez] Cahit, Department of Civil Engineering, Izmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Izmir, Turkey; [Irfanoglu] Ayhan, Lyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, United States; [Ozturk] Baki, Department of Civil Engineering, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Pujol] Santiago, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, CAN, New Zealand; [Shah] Prateek P., Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., Northbrook, IL, United States en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.volume 2024 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.index.type Scopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 76063019-39f0-4755-a8ae-8f0f9b537227
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4020-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files