Xenograft Tumor Volume Measurement in Nude Mice: Estimation of 3d Ultrasound Volume Measurements Based on Manual Caliper Measurements

dc.contributor.author Barış, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Serinan, Efe
dc.contributor.author Çalışır, Meryem
dc.contributor.author Şimşek, Kürşat
dc.contributor.author Aktaş, Safiye
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Osman
dc.contributor.author Seçil, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Kılıç Özdemir, Sevgi
dc.coverage.doi 10.30621/jbachs.2020.902
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-24T18:32:39Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-24T18:32:39Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract Objectives: Volume measurement of subcutaneous xenograft tumors in nude mice models is an important metric to assess tumor growth or response to therapy. Manual calipers are widely used for this purpose. But the measurements with manual calipers may be inaccurate. Contrarily, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonographic measurements give reliable and accurate tumor volume calculation. We aim to; evaluate the accuracy of common four formulas given in the literature to estimate xenograft tumor volumes based on manual caliper measurements and offer a new coefficient for a better estimation of the tumor volumes. Patients and Methods: Detailed manual diameter measurements of xenograft tumors were in 14 nude mice performed using Vernier caliper. Tumor volumes were calculated using the suggested formulas in the literature based on manual measurements. 3D ultrasound volume measurements were performed on same xenograft tumors using high resolution Vevo 2100 imaging system. To propose a new coefficient; means of ratio between manual and ultrasound volume measurement values were used. Also, data set was divided into two subgroups as tumor volume under 800 mm3 and over 800 mm3. New coefficients for each subgroup were defined. Results: Only with prolate ellipsoid formula there was no statistically significant difference between volume measurements with two methods (p=0,24). Our proposed formula (0,45 L*W*H) could estimate tumor volumes as good as prolate ellipsoid formula. Coefficient 0,35 and 0,81 in the same formula were found efficient in the selected subgroups. Conclusion: Using one common coefficient/formula for tumor volume estimation in any tumor size can be inaccurate. Appropriate coefficient should be chosen according to the dataset worked with. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.30621/jbachs.2020.902
dc.identifier.issn 2458-8938
dc.identifier.issn 2564-7288
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.2020.902
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/10162
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/370778
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Xenograft Tumor Volume Measurement in Nude Mice: Estimation of 3d Ultrasound Volume Measurements Based on Manual Caliper Measurements en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Özdemir, Sevgi Kılıç
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Chemical Engineering en_US
gdc.description.endpage 95 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 90 en_US
gdc.description.volume 4 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.openalex W3028480125
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 370778
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000533600300001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 2.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.825347E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Tumor volume;nude mice;ultrasonography;3-D imaging;laboratory animal science
gdc.oaire.popularity 4.485801E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.61836386
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.69
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 23
gdc.wos.citedcount 14
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ddc385b0-056d-4130-88d4-a3600a792ad0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4021-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
10.30621-jbachs.2020.902-1460521.pdf
Size:
2.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article (Makale)