Importance of Static Correction and Damping in the Analysis of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected To Displacement Loading
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Hızal, Çağlayan
Turan, Gürsoy
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Cable-stayed bridges with long spans are excited by different support vibrations on both sides of the main span. Therefore, a realistic seismic structural analysis of the bridge must involve multiple-support excitation. The dynamic equation of motion, in which all degrees of freedom are solved at once, can be solved directly. A modal analysis might also be possible, but care must be taken with the number of modes used in the analysis. If the ground motion is described in terms of displacement and velocity, which is referred to as displacement loading, then a static correction that will account for the unconsidered higher modes must be performed. In this study, the procedure of multiple-support excitation through the use of modal transformation is explained in detail. The effects of changes in damping levels that affect the analysis results are investigated by using the static correction method in displacement loading. An example is given to illustrate the mentioned problem by using a finite-element model of the cable-stayed Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge.
Description
Keywords
Damping effect, Displacement loading, Modal analysis, Static correction method, Multiple support excitations, Displacement loading, Modal analysis, Damping effect, Static correction method, Multiple support excitations
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0201 civil engineering
Citation
Hızal, Ç., and Turan, G. (2017). Importance of static correction and damping in the analysis of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to displacement loading. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22(6). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001041
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Volume
22
Issue
6
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 12
SCOPUS™ Citations
5
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
4
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Page Views
830
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Downloads
593
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Google Scholar™



