The Quasi-Static Crush Response of Electron-Beam Ti6al4v Body-Centred Lattices: The Effect of the Number of Cells, Strut Diameter and Face Sheet

dc.contributor.author Güden, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Alpkaya, Alican Tuncay
dc.contributor.author Arslan Hamat, Burcu
dc.contributor.author Hızlı, Burak
dc.contributor.author Taşdemirci, Alper
dc.contributor.author Tanrıkulu, A. Alptuğ
dc.contributor.author Yavaş, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-18T06:23:25Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-18T06:23:25Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract The effect of the number of cells, strut diameter and face sheet on the compression of electron-beam-melt (EBM) Ti6Al4V (Ti64) body-centred-cubic (BCC) lattices was investigated experimentally and numerically. The lattices with the same relative density (~0.182) were fabricated with and without 2-mm-thick face sheets in 10 and 5 mm cell size, 8–125 unit cell (two to five cells/edge) and 2 and 1 mm strut diameter. The experimental compression tests were further numerically simulated in the LS-DYNA. Experimentally two bending-dominated crushing modes, namely, lateral and diagonal layer crushing, were determined. The numerical models however exhibited merely a bending-dominated lateral layer crushing mode when the erosion strain was 0.4 and without face-sheet models showed a diagonal layer crushing mode when the erosion strain was 0.3. Lower erosion strains promoted a diagonal layer crushing mode by introducing geometrical inhomogeneity to the lattice, leading to strain localisation as similar to the face sheets which introduced extensive strut bending in the layers adjacent to the face sheets. The face-sheet model showed a higher but decreasing collapse strength at an increasing number of cells, just as opposite to the without face-sheet model, and the collapse strength of both models converged when the number of cells was higher than five-cell/edge. The decrease/increase of the collapse strengths of lattices before the critical number of cells was claimed mainly due to the size-imposed lattice boundary condition, rather than the specimen volume. The difference in the experimental collapse strengths between the 5- and the 10-mm cell-size lattices was ascribed to the variations in the microstructures—hence the material model parameters between the small-diameter and the large-diameter EBM-Ti64 strut lattices. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/str.12411
dc.identifier.issn 392103
dc.identifier.issn 392103 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0039-2103
dc.identifier.issn 1475-1305
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85125105289
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12411
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12153
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Strain en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess en_US
dc.subject Additive manufacturing en_US
dc.subject Body-centred-cubic en_US
dc.subject Compression en_US
dc.title The Quasi-Static Crush Response of Electron-Beam Ti6al4v Body-Centred Lattices: The Effect of the Number of Cells, Strut Diameter and Face Sheet en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id 0000-0002-2926-0661
gdc.author.id 0000-0001-6397-8418
gdc.author.id 0000-0002-2926-0661 en_US
gdc.author.id 0000-0001-6397-8418 en_US
gdc.author.institutional Güden, Mustafa
gdc.author.institutional Alpkaya, Alican Tuncay
gdc.author.institutional Hızlı, Burak
gdc.author.institutional Taşdemirci, Alper
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access embargoed access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial true
gdc.contributor.affiliation Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Turkish Aerospace Industries en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Turkish Aerospace Industries en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Turkish Aerospace Industries en_US
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Mechanical Engineering en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 58 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4214479436
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000759354700001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 16.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.1129828E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.2489535E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0205 materials engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.9783885
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.8
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 1%
gdc.opencitations.count 12
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 4
gdc.plumx.mendeley 14
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 14
gdc.scopus.citedcount 14
gdc.wos.citedcount 13
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 87449276-b7be-45a4-820c-36673adbde18
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4003-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
Strain-2022-The quas.pdf
Size:
93.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: