Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of a Geothermal Drying System
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Helvacı, Hüseyin Utku
Gökçen Akkurt, Gülden
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Renewable energy sources such as geothermal energy can be used in drying processes as a heat source due to the high energy costs of fossil fuels. In this study, geothermal cabinet type dryer was constructed and situated in Balcova-Narlidere Geothermal Field, Turkey where the clean city water of district heating system is used as an energy source for the dryer. The dryer was tested on site for drying of olive leaves and energy and exergy analyses of the drying process conducted under two cases: Case 1. Exhaust air was rejected to the environment. Case 2. A portion of exhaust air was re-circulated. Energy Utilization Ratio (EUR) was determined as 7.96 for Case 1 and 50.36 for Case 2. The highest rate of exergy destruction occurred in the fan, followed by heat exchanger and the dryer, accounting for 0.2913, 0.05663 and 0.0115 kW, respectively. Exergetic efficiency of the drying chamber was calculated as 89.66 %. Re-circulating the exhaust air decreased the exergy value at the outlet of the dryer from 0.1013 to 0.08104 kW, indicating that re-using the air increases the performance of the dyer.
Description
Keywords
Geothermal energy, Energy analysis, Drying, Olive leaves, District heating, Exergy analysis, Exergy analysis, District heating, Olive leaves, Geothermal energy, Energy analysis, Drying
Fields of Science
Citation
Helvacı, H. U., and Gökçen Akkurt, G. (2014). Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal drying system. In İ. Dinçer, A. Midilli, and H. Küçük (Eds.), Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment, (pp. 331-342). Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_29
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
5
Volume
Issue
Start Page
331
End Page
342
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 11
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 43
Google Scholar™


