Investigation of the Best Possible Methods for Wind Turbine Blade Waste Management by Using Gis and Fahp: Turkey Case
| dc.contributor.author | Öztürk, Samet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karipoğlu, Fatih | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-26T13:23:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-26T13:23:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study is to present the status and projections of wind turbine blade retirement in Turkey; to investigate the number of retiring WT blades in the regional, manufacturer, and material aspects; and to discuss the management methods for retired WT blades. To determine the best possible wind turbine blade waste management methods for Turkey, a combined application of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is used in this study. It is found that around nine thousand WT blades will become waste between 2020 and 2039 in Turkey, corresponding to around 80,500 tons of waste. On average, 52,325 tons of glass/carbon and 28,175 tons of polymers will be accumulated between 2020 and 2039 from wind turbine blades. More than half of the WT blade waste will come from two WT manufacturers, namely, Enercon and Nordex. Aegean and Marmara regions will provide 74% of the blade waste, where 33% of them will be 2 MW and 2.5 MW sizes of WT blades. Furthermore, a case study is applied to Izmir city to demonstrate the results of FAHP for finding the best available method to dispose of WT blades. The results show that using blade waste as filling material is the best alternative, while waste-to-energy is the last favorable option for blade waste management. Finally, sensitivity analyses are applied to demonstrate the robustness of the results for the inclusion of new alternatives and the bias of experts’ judgments. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11356-022-23256-6 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0944-1344 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0944-1344 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1614-7499 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85139152653 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23256-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12816 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Science and Pollution Research | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | FAHP | en_US |
| dc.subject | Geographic Information System (GIS) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Wind turbine blade waste | en_US |
| dc.title | Investigation of the Best Possible Methods for Wind Turbine Blade Waste Management by Using Gis and Fahp: Turkey Case | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0002-3314-134X | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0002-3314-134X | en_US |
| gdc.author.institutional | Karipoğlu, Fatih | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | embargoed access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Energy Systems Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 15033 | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 15020 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 30 | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4297327224 | |
| gdc.identifier.pmid | 36168016 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000860427500022 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.index.type | PubMed | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 13.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 3.0280451E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Turkey | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Waste Management | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Geographic Information Systems | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Analytic Hierarchy Process | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.2524007E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 01 natural sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0105 earth and related environmental sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 3.00734933 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.9 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 12 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 20 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 12 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 12 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 11 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 5b51a720-3bd1-4c1b-90ca-22ccbe0a3f93 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4017-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
