Adapting Cities To Pluvial Flooding: the Case of Izmir (türkiye)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Salata, Stefano
Couch, Virginia Thompson
Velibeyoğlu, Koray
Baba, Alper
Saygın, Nicel
Uzelli, Taygun
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the coming decades, climate change will be one of the most significant challenges for urban areas. The quantity, duration and intensity of events, such as flash rains and heat waves, will increase the vulnerability of urban regions while exposing citizens to potentially dangerous conditions. According to the current literature, mainstreaming resilience in urban planning means designing rules that strengthen urban systems’ adaptive and self-regulating functions by reducing their vulnerability. In this work, we aimed to build knowledge for the application of the sponge district concept to Izmir (Türkiye), one of Europe’s most vulnerable areas to pluvial flooding. To do this, we first analyzed the runoff in each urban sub-watershed, then employed a composite index to determine potential areas of intervention for nature-based solutions. Results show that 10% of Izmir’s urban areas are extremely vulnerable to cloudbursts, which means that 40% of the urban population is exposed to this phenomenon. Moreover, the runoff calculation in the sub-watershed demonstrated that the potential flood volume is underestimated, especially in the upslope areas. The results can be used as a template to suggest a stepwise approach to mainstream the resilience of densely-inhabited coastal urban catchments.
Description
Keywords
Ecosystem services, Nature-based solutions, Pluvial flooding, Vulnerability, pluvial flooding; ecosystem services; nature-based solutions; urban planning; resilience; vulnerability
Fields of Science
01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
Volume
14
Issue
24
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 12
Scopus : 11
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 80
SCOPUS™ Citations
11
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
11
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
594
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
278
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™












