Authenticity of Wines Made With Economically Important Grape Varieties Grown in Anatolia by Their Phenolic Profiles
Loading...
Files
Date
2014
Authors
Şen, İlknur
Tokatlı, Figen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd.
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize and compare the wines of main native and nonnative grape varieties grown in Turkey. The polyphenol compositions of red and white monovarietal wines of 11 grape varieties have been evaluated for four vintages (2006-2009). Discrimination of wines with respect to variety and vintage was studied by partial least square-discriminant analysis. Boǧazkere red wines were the highest and Kalecik Karasi{dotless} red wines were the lowest in total phenol content. Syrah wines were the highest in anthocyanin compounds. (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin contents of Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Syrah wines were the highest, whereas those compounds were detected in lower amounts in native wines. For the case of white wines, the discrimination among Emir, Muscat and Sultaniye wines was based on hydroxycinnamic acids, flavan-3-ols and total phenol content. The vintage based discrimination of red wines was affected at most from malvidin compounds. White wines could also be discriminated according to their vintage based on the presence of quercetin-3- O-galactoside, vanillic acid and o-coumaric acid. The phenolic descriptors of wines can be used in the authentication of wines with respect to variety and harvest year. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Description
Keywords
Multivariate analysis, Polyphenol content, Varietal classification, Vintage, Multivariate analysis, Polyphenol content, Vintage, Varietal classification
Fields of Science
0404 agricultural biotechnology, 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Citation
Şen, İ., and Tokatlı, F. (2014). Authenticity of wines made with economically important grape varieties grown in Anatolia by their phenolic profiles. Food Control, 46, 446-454. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.06.015
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
39
Source
Food Control
Volume
46
Issue
Start Page
446
End Page
454
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 31
Scopus : 39
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 43
SCOPUS™ Citations
39
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
39
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
901
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
528
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


