Moisture Sorption and Thermal Characteristics of Polyaramide Blend Fabrics
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Four types of fabrics woven from various polyaramid fibers of Nomex and Kevlar blends were characterized by morphology, XRD, elemental analysis, thermal analysis, and moisture adsorption isotherms. The blends consisted of Polybenzimidazole/ Kevlar blend (40% FBI and 60% Kevlar®), Nomex Delta A (blend of 60% Kevlar and 40% Nomex®), Nomex Delta T (blend of 75% Nomex, 23% Kevlar, and 2% P140 antistatic fiber), and Nomex III (fabric with a 95/5 blend of Nomex and Kevlar) containing 1% steel fiber. TGA and DTG curves have been compared to evaluate thermal behavior of the FBI, Kevlar, and Nomex blends and the resuls were correlated with the moisture sorption data. The data were also compared with fiber morphologies provided by SEM and crystallinities derived from XRD diffrac tograms. Moisture adsorption isotherms were correlated with a number of empirical models, including Nernst, Freundlich, Handersen, Iglesias-Chirife, and with the models having a theoretical background such as Langmuir, BET, GAB, and Hüttig. The linear regression models were statistically analyzed to obtain the best fitting model that explains the sorption profiles of the samples and theoretical monolayer moisture capacities of Nomex and Kevlar blends were calculated by using Hüttig isotherms.
Description
Keywords
Polymer blends, Adsorption, Blend, Crystallinity, Isotherms, 660, Polymer blends, Adsorption, Blend, Crystallinity, Isotherms
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
Genç, G., Alp, B., Balköse, D., Ülkü, S., and Cireli, A. (2006). Moisture sorption and thermal characteristics of polyaramide blend fabrics. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 102(1), 29-38. doi:10.1002/app.24184
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Volume
102
Issue
1
Start Page
29
End Page
38
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 10
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 15
Google Scholar™


