Use of Spent Foundry Sand and Fly Ash for the Development of Green Self-Consolidating Concrete
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the United States alone, the foundry industry discards up to 10 million tons of sand each year, offering up a plentiful potential resource to replace sand in concrete products. However, because the use of spent foundry sand (SFS) is currently very limited in the concrete industry, this study investigates whether SFS can successfully be used as a sand replacement material in cost-effective, green, self-consolidating concrete (SCC). In the study, SCC mixtures were developed to be even more inexpensive and environmentally friendly by incorporating Portland cement with fly ash (FA). Tests done on SCC mixtures to determine fresh properties (slump flow diameter, slump flow time, V-funnel flow time, yield stress, and relative viscosity), compressive strength, drying shrinkage and transport properties (rapid chloride permeability and volume of permeable pores) show that replacing up to 100% of sand with SFS and up to 70% Portland cement with FA enables the manufacture of green, lower cost SCC mixtures with proper fresh, mechanical and durability properties. The beneficial effects of FA compensate for some possible detrimental effects of SFS.
Description
Keywords
Durability, Fly ash, Foundry sand, Mechanical properties, Self consolidating concrete, Foundry sand, Mechanical properties, Fly ash, Durability, Self consolidating concrete
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Şahmaran, M., Lachemi, M., Erdem, T. K., and Yücel, H. E. (2011). Use of spent foundry sand and fly ash for the development of green self-consolidating concrete. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 44(7), 1193-1204. doi:10.1617/s11527-010-9692-7
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
77
Source
Volume
44
Issue
7
Start Page
1193
End Page
1204
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 22
Scopus : 88
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 126
Google Scholar™


