Comparison of Ros Formation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Cleome Gynandra (c 4) and Cleome Spinosa (c 3) Under Drought Stress

dc.contributor.author Uzilday, Barış
dc.contributor.author Türkan, İsmail
dc.contributor.author Sekmen, Aşkım Hediye
dc.contributor.author Özgür, Rengin
dc.contributor.author Karakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar
dc.coverage.doi 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-07T12:31:55Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-07T12:31:55Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.description.abstract Differences between antioxidant responses to drought in C 3 and C 4 plants are rather scanty. Even, we are not aware of any research on comparative ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in C 3 and C 4 species differing in carboxylation pathway of same genus which would be useful to prevent other differences in plant metabolism. With this aim, relative shoot growth rate, relative water content and osmotic potential, hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) content and NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity, antioxidant defence system (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR) enzymes and their isoenzymes), CAT1 mRNA level, and lipid peroxidation in seedlings of Cleome spinosa (C 3) and Cleome gynandra (C 4) species of Cleome genus exposed to drought stress for 5 and 10 day (d) were comparatively investigated. Constitutive levels of antioxidant enzymes (except SOD) were consistently higher in C. spinosa than in C. gynandra under control conditions. CAT1 gene expression in C. spinosa was correlated with CAT activity but CAT1 gene expression in C. gynandra at 10 d did not show this correlation. Drought stress caused an increase in POX, CAT, APX and GR in both species. However, SOD activity was slightly decreased in C. gynandra while it was remained unchanged or increased on 5 and 10 d of stress in C. spinosa, respectively. Parallel to results of malon dialdehyde (MDA), H 2O 2 content was also remarkably increased in C. spinosa as compared to C. gynandra under drought stress. These results suggest that in C. spinosa, antioxidant defence system was insufficient to suppress the increasing ROS production under stress condition. On the other hand, in C. gynandra, although its induction was lower as compared to C. spinosa, antioxidant system was able to cope with ROS formation under drought stress. © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Uzilday, B., Türkan, İ., Sekmen, A. H., Özgür, R., and Karakaya, H. Ç. (2012). Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C 4) and Cleome spinosa (C 3) under drought stress. Plant Science, 182(1), 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015
dc.identifier.issn 0168-9452
dc.identifier.issn 1873-2259
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-82155179257
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4804
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Plant Science en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Antioxidant enzymes en_US
dc.subject Cleome gynandra en_US
dc.subject Cleome spinosa en_US
dc.subject Drought analysis en_US
dc.title Comparison of Ros Formation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Cleome Gynandra (c 4) and Cleome Spinosa (c 3) Under Drought Stress en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Karakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar
gdc.author.yokid 24898
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C3
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Molecular Biology and Genetics en_US
gdc.description.endpage 70 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 59 en_US
gdc.description.volume 182 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W1992627792
gdc.identifier.pmid 22118616
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000298723200008
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.accesstype BRONZE
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 24.0
gdc.oaire.influence 7.266288E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Superoxide Dismutase
gdc.oaire.keywords NADPH Oxidases
gdc.oaire.keywords Hydrogen Peroxide
gdc.oaire.keywords Catalase
gdc.oaire.keywords Adaptation, Physiological
gdc.oaire.keywords Antioxidants
gdc.oaire.keywords Droughts
gdc.oaire.keywords Oxidative Stress
gdc.oaire.keywords Ascorbate Peroxidases
gdc.oaire.keywords Glutathione Reductase
gdc.oaire.keywords Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
gdc.oaire.keywords Osmotic Pressure
gdc.oaire.keywords Stress, Physiological
gdc.oaire.keywords Cleome
gdc.oaire.keywords Lipid Peroxidation
gdc.oaire.keywords Reactive Oxygen Species
gdc.oaire.keywords Plant Shoots
gdc.oaire.keywords Peroxidase
gdc.oaire.keywords C-3 and C-4
gdc.oaire.keywords Drought
gdc.oaire.keywords H2O2
gdc.oaire.keywords Cleome gynandra
gdc.oaire.keywords C 3 and C 4
gdc.oaire.keywords Drought analysis
gdc.oaire.keywords Antioxidant enzymes
gdc.oaire.keywords Cleome spinosa
gdc.oaire.keywords H 2O 2
gdc.oaire.popularity 5.6485796E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0301 basic medicine
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0303 health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 8.76958152
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.98
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 140
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 93
gdc.plumx.mendeley 180
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 49
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 166
gdc.scopus.citedcount 166
gdc.wos.citedcount 135
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 8c954c9a-1665-4d9d-ae47-a1113b2727ef
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4013-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
4804.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: