Ranking Tandem Mass Spectra: and the Impact of Database Size and Scoring Function on Peptide Spectrum Matches
| dc.contributor.author | Has, Canan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kundakçı, Cemal Ulaş | |
| dc.contributor.author | Altay, Aybuge | |
| dc.contributor.author | Allmer, Jens | |
| dc.coverage.doi | 10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661686 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-17T09:04:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-17T09:04:13Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.description | 8th International Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, HIBIT 2013; Ankara; Turkey; 25 September 2013 through 27 September 2013 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Proteomics is currently driven by mass spectrometry. For the analysis of tandem mass spectra many computational algorithms have been proposed. There are two approaches, one which assigns a peptide sequence to a tandem mass spectrum directly and one which employs a sequence database for looking up possible solutions. The former method needs high quality spectra while the latter can tolerate lower quality spectra. Since both methods are computationally expensive, it is sensible to establish spectral quality using an independent fast algorithm. In this study, we first establish proper settings for database search algorithms for the analysis of spectra in our gold benchmark dataset and then analyze the performance of ScanRanker, an algorithm for quality assessment of tandem MS spectra, on this ground truth data. We found that OMSSA and MSGFDB have limitations in their scoring functions but were able to form a proper consensus prediction using majority vote for our benchmark data. Unfortunately, ScanRanker's results do not correlate well with the consensus and ScanRanker is also too slow to be used in the capacity it is supposed to be used. © 2013 IEEE | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Has, C., Kundakçı, C. U., Altay, A., and Allmer, J. (2013, September 25-27). Ranking tandem mass spectra: And the impact of database size and scoring function on peptide spectrum matches. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics. doi:10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661686 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661686 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661686 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781479907014 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84892634324 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661686 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5321 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 8th International Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, HIBIT 2013 | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Database size | en_US |
| dc.subject | False discovery rate | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mass spectrometry | en_US |
| dc.subject | ScanRanker | en_US |
| dc.subject | Scoring algorithm | en_US |
| dc.subject | Spectrum qualify | en_US |
| dc.title | Ranking Tandem Mass Spectra: and the Impact of Database Size and Scoring Function on Peptide Spectrum Matches | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference Object | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Has, Canan | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Kundakçı, Cemal Ulaş | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Altay, Aybuge | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Allmer, Jens | |
| gdc.author.yokid | 114186 | |
| gdc.author.yokid | 107974 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C5 | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::conference output | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Molecular Biology and Genetics | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 6 | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | N/A | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 1 | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | N/A | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2054534106 | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 0.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.6961535E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Scoring algorithm | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Mass spectrometry | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | ScanRanker | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | False discovery rate | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Database size | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Spectrum qualify | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 7.012068E-10 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0301 basic medicine | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 03 medical and health sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 0.0 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.08 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 1 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 3 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 1 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 1 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | bf9f97a4-6d62-49cd-a7c8-1bc8463d14d2 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4013-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
