Flood Hydrograph Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods

dc.contributor.author Tayfur, Gökmen
dc.contributor.author Singh, Vijay P.
dc.contributor.author Moramarco, Tommaso
dc.contributor.author Barbetta, Silvia
dc.coverage.doi 10.3390/w10080968
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-19T12:23:55Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-19T12:23:55Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description.abstract Machine learning (soft) methods have a wide range of applications in many disciplines, including hydrology. The first application of these methods in hydrology started in the 1990s and have since been extensively employed. Flood hydrograph prediction is important in hydrology and is generally done using linear or nonlinear Muskingum (NLM) methods or the numerical solutions of St. Venant (SV) flow equations or their simplified forms. However, soft computing methods are also utilized. This study discusses the application of the artificial neural network (ANN), the genetic algorithm (GA), the ant colony optimization (ACO), and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods for flood hydrograph predictions. Flow field data recorded on an equipped reach of Tiber River, central Italy, are used for training the ANN and to find the optimal values of the parameters of the rating curve method (RCM) by the GA, ACO, and PSO methods. Real hydrographs are satisfactorily predicted by the methods with an error in peak discharge and time to peak not exceeding, on average, 4% and 1%, respectively. In addition, the parameters of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model (NMM) are optimized by the same methods for flood routing in an artificial channel. Flood hydrographs generated by the NMM are compared against those obtained by the numerical solutions of the St. Venant equations. Results reveal that the machine learning models (ANN, GA, ACO, and PSO) are powerful tools and can be gainfully employed for flood hydrograph prediction. They use less and easily measurable data and have no significant parameter estimation problem. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Tayfur, G., Singh, V. P., Moramarco, T., and Barbetta, S. (2018). Flood hydrograph prediction using machine learning methods. Water, 10(8). doi:10.3390/w10080968 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/w10080968 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/w10080968
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85050485328
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.3390/w10080968
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/7117
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Water (Switzerland) en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Hydrograph predictions en_US
dc.subject Machine learning methods en_US
dc.subject Nonlinear Muskingum model en_US
dc.subject Rating curve method en_US
dc.subject St. Venant equations en_US
dc.title Flood Hydrograph Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Tayfur, Gökmen
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C3
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering en_US
gdc.description.issue 8 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 10 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W2883646615
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000448462700002
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 24.0
gdc.oaire.influence 5.01163E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Machine learning methods
gdc.oaire.keywords nonlinear Muskingum model
gdc.oaire.keywords Hydrograph predictions
gdc.oaire.keywords Nonlinear Muskingum model
gdc.oaire.keywords Rating curve method
gdc.oaire.keywords St. Venant equations
gdc.oaire.keywords hydrograph predictions
gdc.oaire.keywords machine learning methods
gdc.oaire.keywords rating curve method
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.915771E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0207 environmental engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 4.16335688
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.93
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 47
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 54
gdc.plumx.facebookshareslikecount 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 158
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 65
gdc.scopus.citedcount 65
gdc.wos.citedcount 54
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c04aa74a-2afd-4ce1-be50-e0f634f7c53d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4020-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
7117.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale (Article)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: