Predictive Modeling of Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: Integrating Experimental Insights With Machine Learning on Fe/G-c3n4 Catalysts
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Hydrogen emerges as a promising alternative to fossil fuels with its pollutant-free emissions, high energy density, versatility, and efficiency in generating power. In this study, photocatalytic hydrogen production from using 1000 ppm of model solution prepared with sucrose was investigated in the presence of Fe/g-C3N4 photocatalysts over Box-Behnken experimental design developed using the Minitab statistical software. The amount of hydrogen produced was optimized at different pH environments (3, 5, and 7) for 2 h reaction time with different amounts of metal loaded (10, 20, and 30 wt %), Fe/g-C3N4 (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 g/L), and oxidant (H2O2; 0, 10, and 20 mM) concentrations. SEM, BET, XRD, FTIR, and PL analyses were employed for the characterization of synthesized photocatalysts. According to the response optimization, using Fe/g-C3N4, the optimal conditions for hydrogen production were found as 0.3 g/L catalyst loading, 18.8 mM H2O2, and 26.6% Fe loading by mass when the pH was 3 for the reaction medium. Furthermore, machine learning algorithms were employed to predict hydrogen evolution based on experimental parameters. Notably, ensemble models such as Voting Regressor combining the Bagging Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, LGBM Regressor, Extra Trees Regressor, XGB Regressor, and Gradient Boosting Regressor achieved superior performance with a mean squared error of 0.0068 and R-squared (R 2) of 0.9895. This integrated approach demonstrates the efficacy of machine learning in optimizing photocatalytic hydrogen generation processes.
Description
Keywords
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Volume
64
Issue
10
Start Page
5184
End Page
5199
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 15
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 29
SCOPUS™ Citations
15
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
14
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
28
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
6
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


